Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 254 of 426) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-27775) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(27776-29300) |
Users' Mathboxes
(29301-42551) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | pnt3 25301 | The Prime Number Theorem, version 3: the second Chebyshev function tends asymptotically to 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ ((ψ‘𝑥) / 𝑥)) ⇝𝑟 1 | ||
Theorem | pnt2 25302 | The Prime Number Theorem, version 2: the first Chebyshev function tends asymptotically to 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ ((θ‘𝑥) / 𝑥)) ⇝𝑟 1 | ||
Theorem | pnt 25303 | The Prime Number Theorem: the number of prime numbers less than 𝑥 tends asymptotically to 𝑥 / log(𝑥) as 𝑥 goes to infinity. This is Metamath 100 proof #5. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (1(,)+∞) ↦ ((π‘𝑥) / (𝑥 / (log‘𝑥)))) ⇝𝑟 1 | ||
Theorem | abvcxp 25304* | Raising an absolute value to a power less than one yields another absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)↑𝑐𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (0(,]1)) → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | padicfval 25305* | Value of the p-adic absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → (𝐽‘𝑃) = (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑃↑-(𝑃 pCnt 𝑥))))) | ||
Theorem | padicval 25306* | Value of the p-adic absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥))))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℚ) → ((𝐽‘𝑃)‘𝑋) = if(𝑋 = 0, 0, (𝑃↑-(𝑃 pCnt 𝑋)))) | ||
Theorem | ostth2lem1 25307* | Lemma for ostth2 25326, although it is just a simple statement about exponentials which does not involve any specifics of ostth2 25326. If a power is upper bounded by a linear term, the exponent must be less than one. Or in big-O notation, 𝑛 ∈ 𝑜(𝐴↑𝑛) for any 1 < 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴↑𝑛) ≤ (𝑛 · 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 1) | ||
Theorem | qrngbas 25308 | The base set of the field of rationals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ ℚ = (Base‘𝑄) | ||
Theorem | qdrng 25309 | The rationals form a division ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑄 ∈ DivRing | ||
Theorem | qrng0 25310 | The zero element of the field of rationals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑄) | ||
Theorem | qrng1 25311 | The unit element of the field of rationals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑄) | ||
Theorem | qrngneg 25312 | The additive inverse in the field of rationals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ℚ → ((invg‘𝑄)‘𝑋) = -𝑋) | ||
Theorem | qrngdiv 25313 | The division operation in the field of rationals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 0) → (𝑋(/r‘𝑄)𝑌) = (𝑋 / 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | qabvle 25314 | By using induction on 𝑁, we show a long-range inequality coming from the triangle inequality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑁) ≤ 𝑁) | ||
Theorem | qabvexp 25315 | Induct the product rule abvmul 18829 to find the absolute value of a power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘(𝑀↑𝑁)) = ((𝐹‘𝑀)↑𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | ostthlem1 25316* | Lemma for ostth 25328. If two absolute values agree on the positive integers greater than one, then they agree for all rational numbers and thus are equal as functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = (𝐺‘𝑛)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | ostthlem2 25317* | Lemma for ostth 25328. Refine ostthlem1 25316 so that it is sufficient to only show equality on the primes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ℙ) → (𝐹‘𝑝) = (𝐺‘𝑝)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | qabsabv 25318 | The regular absolute value function on the rationals is in fact an absolute value under our definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (abs ↾ ℚ) ∈ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | padicabv 25319* | The p-adic absolute value (with arbitrary base) is an absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑁↑(𝑃 pCnt 𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0(,)1)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | padicabvf 25320* | The p-adic absolute value is an absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥))))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐽:ℙ⟶𝐴 | ||
Theorem | padicabvcxp 25321* | All positive powers of the p-adic absolute value are absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥))))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝑦 ∈ ℚ ↦ (((𝐽‘𝑃)‘𝑦)↑𝑐𝑅)) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ostth1 25322* | - Lemma for ostth 25328: trivial case. (Not that the proof is trivial, but that we are proving that the function is trivial.) If 𝐹 is equal to 1 on the primes, then by complete induction and the multiplicative property abvmul 18829 of the absolute value, 𝐹 is equal to 1 on all the integers, and ostthlem1 25316 extends this to the other rational numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ ¬ 1 < (𝐹‘𝑛)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑛) < 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐾) | ||
Theorem | ostth2lem2 25323* | Lemma for ostth2 25326. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝐹‘𝑁)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((log‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) / (log‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((log‘(𝐹‘𝑀)) / (log‘𝑀)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = if((𝐹‘𝑀) ≤ 1, 1, (𝐹‘𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (0...((𝑀↑𝑋) − 1))) → (𝐹‘𝑌) ≤ ((𝑀 · 𝑋) · (𝑇↑𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | ostth2lem3 25324* | Lemma for ostth2 25326. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝐹‘𝑁)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((log‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) / (log‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((log‘(𝐹‘𝑀)) / (log‘𝑀)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = if((𝐹‘𝑀) ≤ 1, 1, (𝐹‘𝑀)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((log‘𝑁) / (log‘𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝐹‘𝑁) / (𝑇↑𝑐𝑈))↑𝑋) ≤ (𝑋 · ((𝑀 · 𝑇) · (𝑈 + 1)))) | ||
Theorem | ostth2lem4 25325* | Lemma for ostth2 25326. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝐹‘𝑁)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((log‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) / (log‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((log‘(𝐹‘𝑀)) / (log‘𝑀)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = if((𝐹‘𝑀) ≤ 1, 1, (𝐹‘𝑀)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((log‘𝑁) / (log‘𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 < (𝐹‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | ostth2 25326* | - Lemma for ostth 25328: regular case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝐹‘𝑁)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((log‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) / (log‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ (0(,]1)𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℚ ↦ ((abs‘𝑦)↑𝑐𝑎))) | ||
Theorem | ostth3 25327* | - Lemma for ostth 25328: p-adic case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ ¬ 1 < (𝐹‘𝑛)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) < 1) & ⊢ 𝑅 = -((log‘(𝐹‘𝑃)) / (log‘𝑃)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = if((𝐹‘𝑃) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑝), (𝐹‘𝑝), (𝐹‘𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ+ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℚ ↦ (((𝐽‘𝑃)‘𝑦)↑𝑐𝑎))) | ||
Theorem | ostth 25328* | Ostrowski's theorem, which classifies all absolute values on ℚ. Any such absolute value must either be the trivial absolute value 𝐾, a constant exponent 0 < 𝑎 ≤ 1 times the regular absolute value, or a positive exponent times the p-adic absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹 = 𝐾 ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ (0(,]1)𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℚ ↦ ((abs‘𝑦)↑𝑐𝑎)) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑔 ∈ ran 𝐽 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℚ ↦ ((𝑔‘𝑦)↑𝑐𝑎)))) | ||
This part develops elementary geometry based on Tarski's axioms, following [Schwabhauser]. Tarski's geometry is a first-order theory with one sort, the "points". It has two primitive notions, the ternary predicate of "betweenness" and the quaternary predicate of "congruence". To adapt this theory to the framework of set.mm, and to be able to talk of *a* Tarski structure as a space satisfying the given axioms, we use the following definition, stated informally: A Tarski structure 𝑓 is a set (of points) (Base‘𝑓) together with functions (Itv‘𝑓) and (dist‘𝑓) on ((Base‘𝑓) × (Base‘𝑓)) satisfying certain axioms (given in the definitions df-trkg 25352 et sequentes). This allows us to treat a Tarski structure as a special kind of extensible structure (see df-struct 15859). The translation to and from Tarski's treatment is as follows (given, again, informally). Suppose that one is given an extensible structure 𝑓. One defines a betweenness ternary predicate Btw by positing that, for any 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑓), one has "Btw 𝑥𝑦𝑧 " if and only if 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥(Itv‘𝑓)𝑧, and a congruence quaternary predicate Congr by positing that, for any 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑡 ∈ (Base‘𝑓), one has "Congr 𝑥𝑦𝑧𝑡 " if and only if 𝑥(dist‘𝑓)𝑦 = 𝑧(dist‘𝑓)𝑡. It is easy to check that if 𝑓 satisfies our Tarski axioms, then Btw and Congr satisfy Tarski's Tarski axioms when (Base‘𝑓) is interpreted as the universe of discourse. Conversely, suppose that one is given a set 𝑎, a ternary predicate Btw, and a quaternary predicate Congr. One defines the extensible structure 𝑓 such that (Base‘𝑓) is 𝑎, and (Itv‘𝑓) is the function which associates with each 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ (𝑎 × 𝑎) the set of points 𝑧 ∈ 𝑎 such that "Btw 𝑥𝑧𝑦", and (dist‘𝑓) is the function which associates with each 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ (𝑎 × 𝑎) the set of ordered pairs 〈𝑧, 𝑡〉 ∈ (𝑎 × 𝑎) such that "Congr 𝑥𝑦𝑧𝑡". It is easy to check that if Btw and Congr satisfy Tarski's Tarski axioms when 𝑎 is interpreted as the universe of discourse, then 𝑓 satisfies our Tarski axioms. We intentionally choose to represent congruence (without loss of generality) as 𝑥(dist‘𝑓)𝑦 = 𝑧(dist‘𝑓)𝑡 instead of "Congr 𝑥𝑦𝑧𝑡", as it is more convenient. It is always possible to define dist for any particular geometry to produce equal results when conguence is desired, and in many cases there is an obvious interpretation of "distance" between two points that can be useful in other situations. A similar representation is used in Axiom A1 of [Beeson2016] p. 5, which discusses how a large number of formalized proofs were found in Tarskian Geometry using OTTER. Their detailed proofs in Tarski Geometry, along with other information, are available at http://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/FormalTarski/. Most theorems are in deduction form, as this is a very general, simple, and convenient format to use in Metamath. An assertion in deduction form can be easily converted into an assertion in inference form (removing the antecedents 𝜑 →) by insert a ⊤ → in each hypothesis, using a1i 11, then using trud 1493 to remove the final ⊤ → prefix. In some cases we represent, without loss of generality, an implication antecedent in [Schwabhauser] as a hypothesis. The implication can be retrieved from the by using simpr 477, the theorem as stated, and ex 450. For descriptions of individual axioms, we refer to the specific definitions below. A particular feature of Tarski's axioms is modularity, so by using various subsets of the set of axioms, we can define the classes of "absolute dimensionless Tarski structures" (df-trkg 25352), of "Euclidean dimensionless Tarski structures" (df-trkge 25350) and of "Tarski structures of dimension no less than N" (df-trkgld 25351). The first section is devoted to the definitions of these various structures. The second section ("Tarskian geometry") develops the synthetic treatment of geometry. The remaining sections prove that real Euclidean spaces and complex Hilbert spaces, with intended interpretations, are Euclidean Tarski structures. Most of the work in this part is due to Thierry Arnoux, with earlier work by Mario Carneiro and Scott Fenton. See also the credits in the comment of each statement. | ||
Syntax | cstrkg 25329 | Extends class notation with the class of Tarski geometries. |
class TarskiG | ||
Syntax | cstrkgc 25330 | Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling the congruence axioms. |
class TarskiGC | ||
Syntax | cstrkgb 25331 | Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling the betweenness axioms. |
class TarskiGB | ||
Syntax | cstrkgcb 25332 | Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling the congruence and betweenness axioms. |
class TarskiGCB | ||
Syntax | cstrkgld 25333 | Extends class notation with the relation for geometries fulfilling the lower dimension axioms. |
class DimTarskiG≥ | ||
Syntax | cstrkge 25334 | Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling Euclid's axiom. |
class TarskiGE | ||
Syntax | citv 25335 | Declare the syntax for the Interval (segment) index extractor. |
class Itv | ||
Syntax | clng 25336 | Declare the syntax for the Line function. |
class LineG | ||
Definition | df-itv 25337 | Define the Interval (segment) index extractor for Tarski geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ Itv = Slot ;16 | ||
Definition | df-lng 25338 | Define the line index extractor for geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ LineG = Slot ;17 | ||
Theorem | itvndx 25339 | Index value of the Interval (segment) slot. Use ndxarg 15882. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ (Itv‘ndx) = ;16 | ||
Theorem | lngndx 25340 | Index value of the "line" slot. Use ndxarg 15882. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ (LineG‘ndx) = ;17 | ||
Theorem | itvid 25341 | Utility theorem: index-independent form of df-itv 25337. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ Itv = Slot (Itv‘ndx) | ||
Theorem | lngid 25342 | Utility theorem: index-independent form of df-lng 25338. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ LineG = Slot (LineG‘ndx) | ||
Theorem | trkgstr 25343 | Functionality of a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑊 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑈〉, 〈(dist‘ndx), 𝐷〉, 〈(Itv‘ndx), 𝐼〉} ⇒ ⊢ 𝑊 Struct 〈1, ;16〉 | ||
Theorem | trkgbas 25344 | The base set of a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑊 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑈〉, 〈(dist‘ndx), 𝐷〉, 〈(Itv‘ndx), 𝐼〉} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | trkgdist 25345 | The measure of a distance in a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑊 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑈〉, 〈(dist‘ndx), 𝐷〉, 〈(Itv‘ndx), 𝐼〉} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | trkgitv 25346 | The congruence relation in a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑊 = {〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑈〉, 〈(dist‘ndx), 𝐷〉, 〈(Itv‘ndx), 𝐼〉} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝑊)) | ||
Definition | df-trkgc 25347* | Define the class of geometries fulfilling the congruence axioms of reflexivity, identity and transitivity. These are axioms A1 to A3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. With our distance based notation for congruence, transitivity of congruence boils down to transitivity of equality and is already given by eqtr 2641, so it is not listed in this definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ TarskiGC = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑓) / 𝑑](∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) = (𝑦𝑑𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑥𝑑𝑦) = (𝑧𝑑𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))} | ||
Definition | df-trkgb 25348* | Define the class of geometries fulfilling the 3 betweenness axioms in Tarski's Axiomatization of Geometry: identity, Axiom A6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11, axiom of Pasch, Axiom A7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 12, and continuity, Axiom A11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ TarskiGB = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑢 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑦𝑖𝑧)) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑎 ∈ (𝑢𝑖𝑦) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑣𝑖𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑝∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝑝(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 𝑥 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑦) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 𝑏 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦)))} | ||
Definition | df-trkgcb 25349* | Define the class of geometries fulfilling the five segment axiom, Axiom A5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11, and segment construction axiom, Axiom A4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ TarskiGCB = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑓) / 𝑑][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑝 (((𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑐)) ∧ (((𝑥𝑑𝑦) = (𝑎𝑑𝑏) ∧ (𝑦𝑑𝑧) = (𝑏𝑑𝑐)) ∧ ((𝑥𝑑𝑢) = (𝑎𝑑𝑣) ∧ (𝑦𝑑𝑢) = (𝑏𝑑𝑣)))) → (𝑧𝑑𝑢) = (𝑐𝑑𝑣)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧) ∧ (𝑦𝑑𝑧) = (𝑎𝑑𝑏)))} | ||
Definition | df-trkge 25350* | Define the class of geometries fulfilling Euclid's axiom, Axiom A10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ TarskiGE = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑢 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑣) ∧ 𝑢 ∈ (𝑦𝑖𝑧) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑢) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑎) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑏) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑏)))} | ||
Definition | df-trkgld 25351* | Define the class of geometries fulfilling the lower dimension axiom for dimension 𝑛. For such geometries, there are three non-colinear points that are equidistant from 𝑛 − 1 distinct points. Derived from remarks in Tarski's System of Geometry, Alfred Tarski and Steven Givant, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, Volume 5, Number 2 (1999), 175-214. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ DimTarskiG≥ = {〈𝑔, 𝑛〉 ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑔) / 𝑑][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑓(𝑓:(1..^𝑛)–1-1→𝑝 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 (∀𝑗 ∈ (2..^𝑛)(((𝑓‘1)𝑑𝑥) = ((𝑓‘𝑗)𝑑𝑥) ∧ ((𝑓‘1)𝑑𝑦) = ((𝑓‘𝑗)𝑑𝑦) ∧ ((𝑓‘1)𝑑𝑧) = ((𝑓‘𝑗)𝑑𝑧)) ∧ ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))))} | ||
Definition | df-trkg 25352* |
Define the class of Tarski geometries. A Tarski geometry is a set of
points, equipped with a betweenness relation (denoting that a point lies
on a line segment between two other points) and a congruence relation
(denoting equality of line segment lengths).
Here, we are using the following:
Tarski originally had more axioms, but later reduced his list to 11:
So our definition of a Tarskian Geometry includes the 3 axioms for the quaternary congruence relation (A1, A2, A3), the 3 axioms for the ternary betweenness relation (A6, A7, A11), and the 2 axioms of compatibility of the congruence and the betweenness relations (A4,A5). It does not include Euclid's axiom A10, nor the 2-dimensional axioms A8 (Lower dimension axiom) and A9 (Upper dimension axiom) so the number of dimensions of the geometry it formalizes is not constrained. Considering A2 as one of the 3 axioms for the quaternary congruence relation is somewhat conventional, because the transitivity of the congruence relation is automatically given by our choice to take the distance as this congruence relation in our definition of Tarski geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ TarskiG = ((TarskiGC ∩ TarskiGB) ∩ (TarskiGCB ∩ {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})})) | ||
Theorem | istrkgc 25353* | Property of being a Tarski geometry - congruence part. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiGC ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 − 𝑦) = (𝑦 − 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑥 − 𝑦) = (𝑧 − 𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | istrkgb 25354* | Property of being a Tarski geometry - betweenness part. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiGB ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑢 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑦𝐼𝑧)) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎 ∈ (𝑢𝐼𝑦) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑣𝐼𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑃∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝑃(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 𝑥 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑦) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 𝑏 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦))))) | ||
Theorem | istrkgcb 25355* | Property of being a Tarski geometry - congruence and betweenness part. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiGCB ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑐)) ∧ (((𝑥 − 𝑦) = (𝑎 − 𝑏) ∧ (𝑦 − 𝑧) = (𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ ((𝑥 − 𝑢) = (𝑎 − 𝑣) ∧ (𝑦 − 𝑢) = (𝑏 − 𝑣)))) → (𝑧 − 𝑢) = (𝑐 − 𝑣)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧) ∧ (𝑦 − 𝑧) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))))) | ||
Theorem | istrkge 25356* | Property of fulfilling Euclid's axiom. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑢 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑣) ∧ 𝑢 ∈ (𝑦𝐼𝑧) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑢) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑎) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑏) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))))) | ||
Theorem | istrkgl 25357* | Building lines from the segment property. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})} ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (LineG‘𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))) | ||
Theorem | istrkgld 25358* | Property of fulfilling the lower dimension 𝑁 axiom. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝐺DimTarskiG≥𝑁 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1..^𝑁)–1-1→𝑃 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (∀𝑗 ∈ (2..^𝑁)(((𝑓‘1) − 𝑥) = ((𝑓‘𝑗) − 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑓‘1) − 𝑦) = ((𝑓‘𝑗) − 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑓‘1) − 𝑧) = ((𝑓‘𝑗) − 𝑧)) ∧ ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧)))))) | ||
Theorem | istrkg2ld 25359* | Property of fulfilling the lower dimension 2 axiom. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺DimTarskiG≥2 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧)))) | ||
Theorem | istrkg3ld 25360* | Property of fulfilling the lower dimension 3 axiom. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺DimTarskiG≥3 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝑢 − 𝑥) = (𝑣 − 𝑥) ∧ (𝑢 − 𝑦) = (𝑣 − 𝑦) ∧ (𝑢 − 𝑧) = (𝑣 − 𝑧)) ∧ ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧)))))) | ||
Theorem | axtgcgrrflx 25361 | Axiom of reflexivity of congruence, Axiom A1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝑌 − 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | axtgcgrid 25362 | Axiom of identity of congruence, Axiom A3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝑍 − 𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌) | ||
Theorem | axtgsegcon 25363* | Axiom of segment construction, Axiom A4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. As discussed in Axiom 4 of [Tarski1999] p. 178, "The intuitive content [is that] given any line segment 𝐴𝐵, one can construct a line segment congruent to it, starting at any point 𝑌 and going in the direction of any ray containing 𝑌. The ray is determined by the point 𝑌 and a second point 𝑋, the endpoint of the ray. The other endpoint of the line segment to be constructed is just the point 𝑧 whose existence is asserted." (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧) ∧ (𝑌 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | axtg5seg 25364 | Five segments axiom, Axiom A5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. Take two triangles 𝑋𝑍𝑈 and 𝐴𝐶𝑉, a point 𝑌 on 𝑋𝑍, and a point 𝐵 on 𝐴𝐶. If all corresponding line segments except for 𝑍𝑈 and 𝐶𝑉 are congruent ( i.e., 𝑋𝑌 ∼ 𝐴𝐵, 𝑌𝑍 ∼ 𝐵𝐶, 𝑋𝑈 ∼ 𝐴𝑉, and 𝑌𝑈 ∼ 𝐵𝑉), then 𝑍𝑈 and 𝐶𝑉 are also congruent. As noted in Axiom 5 of [Tarski1999] p. 178, "this axiom is similar in character to the well-known theorems of Euclidean geometry that allow one to conclude, from hypotheses about the congruence of certain corresponding sides and angles in two triangles, the congruence of other corresponding sides and angles." (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝐴 − 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝐵 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑈) = (𝐴 − 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑈) = (𝐵 − 𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 − 𝑈) = (𝐶 − 𝑉)) | ||
Theorem | axtgbtwnid 25365 | Identity of Betweenness. Axiom A6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌) | ||
Theorem | axtgpasch 25366* | Axiom of (Inner) Pasch, Axiom A7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 12. Given triangle 𝑋𝑌𝑍, point 𝑈 in segment 𝑋𝑍, and point 𝑉 in segment 𝑌𝑍, there exists a point 𝑎 on both the segment 𝑈𝑌 and the segment 𝑉𝑋. This axiom is essentially a subset of the general Pasch axiom. The general Pasch axiom asserts that on a plane "a line intersecting a triangle in one of its sides, and not intersecting any of the vertices, must intersect one of the other two sides" (per the discussion about Axiom 7 of [Tarski1999] p. 179). The (general) Pasch axiom was used implicitly by Euclid, but never stated; Moritz Pasch discovered its omission in 1882. As noted in the Metamath book, this means that the omission of Pasch's axiom from Euclid went unnoticed for 2000 years. Only the inner Pasch algorithm is included as an axiom; the "outer" form of the Pasch axiom can be proved using the inner form (see theorem 9.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 69 and the brief discussion in axiom 7.1 of [Tarski1999] p. 180). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎 ∈ (𝑈𝐼𝑌) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑉𝐼𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | axtgcont1 25367* | Axiom of Continuity. Axiom A11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. This axiom (scheme) asserts that any two sets 𝑆 and 𝑇 (of points) such that the elements of 𝑆 precede the elements of 𝑇 with respect to some point 𝑎 (that is, 𝑥 is between 𝑎 and 𝑦 whenever 𝑥 is in 𝑋 and 𝑦 is in 𝑌) are separated by some point 𝑏; this is explained in Axiom 11 of [Tarski1999] p. 185. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑦) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑏 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | axtgcont 25368* | Axiom of Continuity. Axiom A11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. For more information see axtgcont1 25367. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑢 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑣)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑏 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | axtglowdim2 25369* | Lower dimension axiom for dimension 2, Axiom A8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. There exist 3 non-colinear points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | axtgupdim2 25370 | Upper dimension axiom for dimension 2, Axiom A9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. Three points 𝑋, 𝑌 and 𝑍 equidistant to two given two points 𝑈 and 𝑉 must be colinear. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-May-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 − 𝑋) = (𝑉 − 𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 − 𝑌) = (𝑉 − 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 − 𝑍) = (𝑉 − 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐺DimTarskiG≥3) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | axtgeucl 25371* | Euclid's Axiom. Axiom A10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. This is equivalent to Euclid's parallel postulate when combined with other axioms. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑎) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑏) ∧ 𝑉 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))) | ||
Theorem | tgcgrcomimp 25372 | Congruence commutes on the RHS. Theorem 2.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 29-Jun-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | tgcgrcomr 25373 | Congruence commutes on the RHS. Variant of Theorem 2.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27, but in a convenient form for a common case. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 29-Jun-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | tgcgrcoml 25374 | Congruence commutes on the LHS. Variant of Theorem 2.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 27, but in a convenient form for a common case. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 29-Jun-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | tgcgrcomlr 25375 | Congruence commutes on both sides. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐴) = (𝐷 − 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | tgcgreqb 25376 | Congruence and equality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | tgcgreq 25377 | Congruence and equality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | tgcgrneq 25378 | Congruence and equality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | tgcgrtriv 25379 | Degenerate segments are congruent. Theorem 2.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐴) = (𝐵 − 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | tgcgrextend 25380 | Link congruence over a pair of line segments. Theorem 2.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 29. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) (Shortened by David A. Wheeler and Thierry Arnoux, 22-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | tgsegconeq 25381 | Two points that satisfy the conclusion of axtgsegcon 25363 are identical. Uniqueness portion of Theorem 2.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 29. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐸) = (𝐵 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐹) = (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwntriv2 25382 | Betweenness always holds for the second endpoint. Theorem 3.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwncom 25383 | Betweenness commutes. Theorem 3.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwncomb 25384 | Betweenness commutes, biconditional version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnne 25385 | Betweenness and inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwntriv1 25386 | Betweenness always holds for the first endpoint. Theorem 3.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnswapid 25387 | If you can swap the first two arguments of a betweenness statement, then those arguments are identical. Theorem 3.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnintr 25388 | Inner transitivity law for betweenness. Left-hand side of Theorem 3.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnexch3 25389 | Exchange the first endpoint in betweenness. Left-hand side of Theorem 3.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnouttr2 25390 | Outer transitivity law for betweenness. Left-hand side of Theorem 3.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnexch2 25391 | Exchange the outer point of two betweenness statements. Right-hand side of Theorem 3.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnouttr 25392 | Outer transitivity law for betweenness. Right-hand side of Theorem 3.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnexch 25393 | Outer transitivity law for betweenness. Right-hand side of Theorem 3.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | tgtrisegint 25394* | A line segment between two sides of a triange intersects a segment crossing from the remaining side to the opposite vertex. Theorem 3.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 33. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑞 ∈ (𝐹𝐼𝐶) ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐸))) | ||
Theorem | tglowdim1 25395* | Lower dimension axiom for one dimension. In dimension at least 1, there are at least two distinct points. The condition "the space is of dimension 1 or more" is written here as 2 ≤ (#‘𝑃) to avoid a new definition, but a different convention could be chosen. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ≤ (#‘𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | tglowdim1i 25396* | Lower dimension axiom for one dimension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ≤ (#‘𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 𝑋 ≠ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | tgldimor 25397 | Excluded-middle like statement allowing to treat dimension zero as a special case. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐸‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((#‘𝑃) = 1 ∨ 2 ≤ (#‘𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | tgldim0eq 25398 | In dimension zero, any two points are equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐸‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (#‘𝑃) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | tgldim0itv 25399 | In dimension zero, any two points are equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (#‘𝑃) = 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | tgldim0cgr 25400 | In dimension zero, any two pairs of points are congruent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (#‘𝑃) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |