Theorem ax11o 1743

Description: Derivation of set.mm's original ax-11o 1744 from the shorter ax-11 1437 that has replaced it.

An open problem is whether this theorem can be proved without relying on ax-16 1735 or ax-17 1459.

Normally, ax11o 1743 should be used rather than ax-11o 1744, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax11o	|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )

Proof of Theorem ax11o

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-11 1437	. 2 |- ( x = z -> ( A. z ph -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )
2	1	ax11a2 1742	1 |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   A.wal 1282

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in2 577  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686

This theorem is referenced by:  ax11b  1747  equs5  1750