Theorem elab3 2745

Description: Membership in a class abstraction using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2000.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elab3.1	|- ( ps -> A e. _V )
elab3.2	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elab3	|- ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps )

Distinct variable groups:   ps, x   x, A

Allowed substitution hint:   ph( x)

Proof of Theorem elab3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elab3.1	. 2 |- ( ps -> A e. _V )
2		elab3.2	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
3	2	elab3g 2744	. 2 |- ( ( ps -> A e. _V ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
4	1, 3	ax-mp 7	1 |- ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 103   = wceq 1284   e. wcel 1433   {cab 2067   _Vcvv 2601

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-v 2603

This theorem is referenced by:  elrnmpt2  5634  isfi  6264  addnqprlemfl  6749  addnqprlemfu  6750  mulnqprlemfl  6765  mulnqprlemfu  6766