Theorem elab3gf 2743

Description: Membership in a class abstraction, with a weaker antecedent than elabgf 2736. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elab3gf.1	|- F/_ x A
elab3gf.2	|- F/ x ps
elab3gf.3	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elab3gf	|- ( ( ps -> A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )

Proof of Theorem elab3gf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elab3gf.1	. . . 4 |- F/_ x A
2		elab3gf.2	. . . 4 |- F/ x ps
3		elab3gf.3	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
4	1, 2, 3	elabgf 2736	. . 3 |- ( A e. { x | ph } -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
5	4	ibi 174	. 2 |- ( A e. { x | ph } -> ps )
6	1, 2, 3	elabgf 2736	. . . 4 |- ( A e. B -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
7	6	imim2i 12	. . 3 |- ( ( ps -> A e. B ) -> ( ps -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) ) )
8		bi2 128	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) -> ( ps -> A e. { x | ph } ) )
9	7, 8	syli 37	. 2 |- ( ( ps -> A e. B ) -> ( ps -> A e. { x | ph } ) )
10	5, 9	impbid2 141	1 |- ( ( ps -> A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 103   = wceq 1284   F/wnf 1389   e. wcel 1433   {cab 2067   F/_wnfc 2206

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-v 2603

This theorem is referenced by:  elab3g  2744