Theorem elabgf 2736

Description: Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elabgf.1	|- F/_ x A
elabgf.2	|- F/ x ps
elabgf.3	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elabgf	|- ( A e. B -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )

Proof of Theorem elabgf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elabgf.1	. 2 |- F/_ x A
2		nfab1 2221	. . . 4 |- F/_ x { x | ph }
3	1, 2	nfel 2227	. . 3 |- F/ x A e. { x | ph }
4		elabgf.2	. . 3 |- F/ x ps
5	3, 4	nfbi 1521	. 2 |- F/ x ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps )
6		eleq1 2141	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( x e. { x | ph } <-> A e. { x | ph } ) )
7		elabgf.3	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
8	6, 7	bibi12d 233	. 2 |- ( x = A -> ( ( x e. { x | ph } <-> ph ) <-> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) ) )
9		abid 2069	. 2 |- ( x e. { x | ph } <-> ph )
10	1, 5, 8, 9	vtoclgf 2657	1 |- ( A e. B -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 103   = wceq 1284   F/wnf 1389   e. wcel 1433   {cab 2067   F/_wnfc 2206

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-v 2603

This theorem is referenced by:  elabf  2737  elabg  2739  elab3gf  2743  elrabf  2747  bj-intabssel  10599