Theorem bdsepnf 10679

Description: Version of ax-bdsep 10675 with one DV condition removed, the other DV condition replaced by a non-freeness hypothesis, and without initial universal quantifier. See also bdsepnfALT 10680. Use bdsep1 10676 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bdsepnf.nf	⊢ Ⅎ𝑏𝜑
bdsepnf.1	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdsepnf	⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑎,𝑏,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑎,𝑏)

Proof of Theorem bdsepnf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdsepnf.1	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
2	1	bdsepnft 10678	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑏𝜑 → ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑)))
3		bdsepnf.nf	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑏𝜑
4	2, 3	mpg 1380	1 ⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103  ∀wal 1282  Ⅎwnf 1389  ∃wex 1421  BOUNDED wbd 10603

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-4 1440  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-bdsep 10675

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077

This theorem is referenced by: (None)