![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > intexabim | GIF version |
Description: The intersection of an inhabited class abstraction exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Aug-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
intexabim | ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | abid 2069 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
2 | 1 | exbii 1536 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑) |
3 | nfsab1 2071 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} | |
4 | nfv 1461 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} | |
5 | eleq1 2141 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) | |
6 | 3, 4, 5 | cbvex 1679 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
7 | inteximm 3924 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) | |
8 | 6, 7 | sylbir 133 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
9 | 2, 8 | sylbir 133 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∃wex 1421 ∈ wcel 1433 {cab 2067 Vcvv 2601 ∩ cint 3636 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-io 662 ax-5 1376 ax-7 1377 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-8 1435 ax-10 1436 ax-11 1437 ax-i12 1438 ax-bndl 1439 ax-4 1440 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 ax-i5r 1468 ax-ext 2063 ax-sep 3896 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-tru 1287 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-clab 2068 df-cleq 2074 df-clel 2077 df-nfc 2208 df-v 2603 df-in 2979 df-ss 2986 df-int 3637 |
This theorem is referenced by: intexrabim 3928 omex 4334 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |