| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nfcdeq | GIF version | ||
| Description: If we have a conditional equality proof, where 𝜑 is 𝜑(𝑥) and 𝜓 is 𝜑(𝑦), and 𝜑(𝑥) in fact does not have 𝑥 free in it according to Ⅎ, then 𝜑(𝑥) ↔ 𝜑(𝑦) unconditionally. This proves that Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 is actually a not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| nfcdeq.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 |
| nfcdeq.2 | ⊢ CondEq(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| nfcdeq | ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nfcdeq.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
| 2 | 1 | sbf 1700 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) |
| 3 | nfv 1461 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 | |
| 4 | nfcdeq.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ CondEq(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 5 | 4 | cdeqri 2801 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| 6 | 3, 5 | sbie 1714 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) |
| 7 | 2, 6 | bitr3i 184 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ↔ wb 103 Ⅎwnf 1389 [wsb 1685 CondEqwcdeq 2798 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-5 1376 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-4 1440 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-cdeq 2799 |
| This theorem is referenced by: nfccdeq 2813 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |