Theorem nrexdv 2454

Description: Deduction adding restricted existential quantifier to negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nrexdv.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nrexdv	⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem nrexdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nrexdv.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝜓)
2	1	ralrimiva 2434	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜓)
3		ralnex 2358	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
4	2, 3	sylib 120	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   ∈ wcel 1433  ∀wral 2348  ∃wrex 2349

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 576  ax-in2 577  ax-5 1376  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie2 1423  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-fal 1290  df-nf 1390  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354

This theorem is referenced by:  ltpopr  6785  cauappcvgprlemladdru  6846  cauappcvgprlemladdrl  6847  caucvgprlemladdrl  6868  caucvgprprlemaddq  6898  dvdsle  10244