| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabsn | GIF version | ||
| Description: Condition where a restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabsn | ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | eleq1 2141 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
| 2 | 1 | pm5.32ri 442 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) |
| 3 | 2 | baib 861 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) |
| 4 | 3 | abbidv 2196 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵)} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵}) |
| 5 | df-rab 2357 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵)} | |
| 6 | df-sn 3404 | . 2 ⊢ {𝐵} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} | |
| 7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3eqtr4g 2138 | 1 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵}) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 = wceq 1284 ∈ wcel 1433 {cab 2067 {crab 2352 {csn 3398 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-5 1376 ax-7 1377 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-8 1435 ax-11 1437 ax-4 1440 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 ax-i5r 1468 ax-ext 2063 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-tru 1287 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-clab 2068 df-cleq 2074 df-clel 2077 df-rab 2357 df-sn 3404 |
| This theorem is referenced by: unisn3 4198 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |