Home | Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 35 of 108) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Syntax | cop 3401 | Extend class notation to include ordered pair. |
class 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 | ||
Syntax | cotp 3402 | Extend class notation to include ordered triple. |
class 〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉 | ||
Theorem | snjust 3403* | Soundness justification theorem for df-sn 3404. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐴} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐴} | ||
Definition | df-sn 3404* | Define the singleton of a class. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. For convenience, it is well-defined for proper classes, i.e., those that are not elements of V, although it is not very meaningful in this case. For an alternate definition see dfsn2 3412. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ {𝐴} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐴} | ||
Definition | df-pr 3405 | Define unordered pair of classes. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. They are unordered, so {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐵, 𝐴} as proven by prcom 3468. For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfpr2 3417. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵}) | ||
Definition | df-tp 3406 | Define unordered triple of classes. Definition of [Enderton] p. 19. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∪ {𝐶}) | ||
Definition | df-op 3407* |
Definition of an ordered pair, equivalent to Kuratowski's definition
{{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}} when the arguments are sets.
Since the
behavior of Kuratowski definition is not very useful for proper classes,
we define it to be empty in this case (see opprc1 3592 and opprc2 3593). For
Kuratowski's actual definition when the arguments are sets, see dfop 3569.
Definition 9.1 of [Quine] p. 58 defines an ordered pair unconditionally as 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, which has different behavior from our df-op 3407 when the arguments are proper classes. Ordinarily this difference is not important, since neither definition is meaningful in that case. Our df-op 3407 was chosen because it often makes proofs shorter by eliminating unnecessary sethood hypotheses. There are other ways to define ordered pairs. The basic requirement is that two ordered pairs are equal iff their respective members are equal. In 1914 Norbert Wiener gave the first successful definition 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉_2 = {{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}}. This was simplified by Kazimierz Kuratowski in 1921 to our present definition. An even simpler definition is 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉_3 = {𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, but it requires the Axiom of Regularity for its justification and is not commonly used. Finally, an ordered pair of real numbers can be represented by a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}})} | ||
Definition | df-ot 3408 | Define ordered triple of classes. Definition of ordered triple in [Stoll] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉 = 〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐶〉 | ||
Theorem | sneq 3409 | Equality theorem for singletons. Part of Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴} = {𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | sneqi 3410 | Equality inference for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐵} | ||
Theorem | sneqd 3411 | Equality deduction for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴} = {𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | dfsn2 3412 | Alternate definition of singleton. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐴, 𝐴} | ||
Theorem | elsng 3413 | There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15 (generalized). (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | elsn 3414 | There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | velsn 3415 | There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | elsni 3416 | There is only one element in a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | dfpr2 3417* | Alternate definition of unordered pair. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵)} | ||
Theorem | elprg 3418 | A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15, generalized. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | elpr 3419 | A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | elpr2 3420 | A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | elpri 3421 | If a class is an element of a pair, then it is one of the two paired elements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Apr-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | nelpri 3422 | If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} | ||
Theorem | snidg 3423 | A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}) | ||
Theorem | snidb 3424 | A class is a set iff it is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}) | ||
Theorem | snid 3425 | A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴} | ||
Theorem | vsnid 3426 | A setvar variable is a member of its singleton (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥} | ||
Theorem | elsn2g 3427 | There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that 𝐵, rather than 𝐴, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | elsn2 3428 | There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that 𝐵, rather than 𝐴, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | mosn 3429* | A singleton has at most one element. This works whether 𝐴 is a proper class or not, and in that sense can be seen as encompassing both snmg 3508 and snprc 3457. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ ∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} | ||
Theorem | ralsnsg 3430* | Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | ralsns 3431* | Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | rexsns 3432* | Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by NM, 22-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | ralsng 3433* | Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | rexsng 3434* | Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | exsnrex 3435 | There is a set being the element of a singleton if and only if there is an element of the singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑀 = {𝑥} ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 𝑀 = {𝑥}) | ||
Theorem | ralsn 3436* | Convert a quantification over a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2009.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | rexsn 3437* | Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | eltpg 3438 | Members of an unordered triple of classes. (Contributed by FL, 2-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | eltpi 3439 | A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | eltp 3440 | A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. Special case of Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | dftp2 3441* | Alternate definition of unordered triple of classes. Special case of Definition 5.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐶)} | ||
Theorem | nfpr 3442 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴, 𝐵} | ||
Theorem | ralprg 3443* | Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | rexprg 3444* | Convert a quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | raltpg 3445* | Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | rextpg 3446* | Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | ralpr 3447* | Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | rexpr 3448* | Convert an existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | raltp 3449* | Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | rextp 3450* | Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | sbcsng 3451* | Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | nfsn 3452 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴} | ||
Theorem | csbsng 3453 | Distribute proper substitution through the singleton of a class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | disjsn 3454 | Intersection with the singleton of a non-member is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ {𝐵}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | disjsn2 3455 | Intersection of distinct singletons is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ({𝐴} ∩ {𝐵}) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | disjpr2 3456 | The intersection of distinct unordered pairs is disjoint. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∩ {𝐶, 𝐷}) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | snprc 3457 | The singleton of a proper class (one that doesn't exist) is the empty set. Theorem 7.2 of [Quine] p. 48. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝐴} = ∅) | ||
Theorem | r19.12sn 3458* | Special case of r19.12 2466 where its converse holds. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by BJ, 20-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | rabsn 3459* | Condition where a restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | rabrsndc 3460* | A class abstraction over a decidable proposition restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ DECID 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 = {𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑀 = ∅ ∨ 𝑀 = {𝐴})) | ||
Theorem | euabsn2 3461* | Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}) | ||
Theorem | euabsn 3462 | Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥}) | ||
Theorem | reusn 3463* | A way to express restricted existential uniqueness of a wff: its restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}) | ||
Theorem | absneu 3464 | Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐴}) → ∃!𝑥𝜑) | ||
Theorem | rabsneu 3465 | Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐴}) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | eusn 3466* | Two ways to express "𝐴 is a singleton." (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2010.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = {𝑥}) | ||
Theorem | rabsnt 3467* | Truth implied by equality of a restricted class abstraction and a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐵} → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | prcom 3468 | Commutative law for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐵, 𝐴} | ||
Theorem | preq1 3469 | Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶}) | ||
Theorem | preq2 3470 | Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | preq12 3471 | Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) | ||
Theorem | preq1i 3472 | Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶} | ||
Theorem | preq2i 3473 | Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ {𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵} | ||
Theorem | preq12i 3474 | Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐷} | ||
Theorem | preq1d 3475 | Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶}) | ||
Theorem | preq2d 3476 | Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | preq12d 3477 | Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐷}) | ||
Theorem | tpeq1 3478 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐷} = {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷}) | ||
Theorem | tpeq2 3479 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐶, 𝐴, 𝐷} = {𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐷}) | ||
Theorem | tpeq3 3480 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | tpeq1d 3481 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐷} = {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷}) | ||
Theorem | tpeq2d 3482 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐶, 𝐴, 𝐷} = {𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐷}) | ||
Theorem | tpeq3d 3483 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | tpeq123d 3484 | Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐸} = {𝐵, 𝐷, 𝐹}) | ||
Theorem | tprot 3485 | Rotation of the elements of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐴} | ||
Theorem | tpcoma 3486 | Swap 1st and 2nd members of an undordered triple. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2015.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐶} | ||
Theorem | tpcomb 3487 | Swap 2nd and 3rd members of an undordered triple. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2015.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐵} | ||
Theorem | tpass 3488 | Split off the first element of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵, 𝐶}) | ||
Theorem | qdass 3489 | Two ways to write an unordered quadruple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.) |
⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∪ {𝐶, 𝐷}) = ({𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∪ {𝐷}) | ||
Theorem | qdassr 3490 | Two ways to write an unordered quadruple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.) |
⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∪ {𝐶, 𝐷}) = ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷}) | ||
Theorem | tpidm12 3491 | Unordered triple {𝐴, 𝐴, 𝐵} is just an overlong way to write {𝐴, 𝐵}. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐴, 𝐵} | ||
Theorem | tpidm13 3492 | Unordered triple {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐴} is just an overlong way to write {𝐴, 𝐵}. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐴} = {𝐴, 𝐵} | ||
Theorem | tpidm23 3493 | Unordered triple {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐵} is just an overlong way to write {𝐴, 𝐵}. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐵} = {𝐴, 𝐵} | ||
Theorem | tpidm 3494 | Unordered triple {𝐴, 𝐴, 𝐴} is just an overlong way to write {𝐴}. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐴, 𝐴} = {𝐴} | ||
Theorem | tppreq3 3495 | An unordered triple is an unordered pair if one of its elements is identical with another element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐴, 𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | prid1g 3496 | An unordered pair contains its first member. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 8-Nov-2008.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | prid2g 3497 | An unordered pair contains its second member. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 8-Nov-2008.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐵 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | prid1 3498 | An unordered pair contains its first member. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} | ||
Theorem | prid2 3499 | An unordered pair contains its second member. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} | ||
Theorem | prprc1 3500 | A proper class vanishes in an unordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐵}) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |