![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ralcomf | GIF version |
Description: Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ralcomf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 |
ralcomf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ralcomf | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ancomsimp 1369 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) | |
2 | 1 | 2albii 1400 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) |
3 | alcom 1407 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) | |
4 | 2, 3 | bitri 182 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) |
5 | ralcomf.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 | |
6 | 5 | r2alf 2383 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑)) |
7 | ralcomf.2 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
8 | 7 | r2alf 2383 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) |
9 | 4, 6, 8 | 3bitr4i 210 | 1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ↔ wb 103 ∀wal 1282 ∈ wcel 1433 Ⅎwnfc 2206 ∀wral 2348 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-io 662 ax-5 1376 ax-7 1377 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-8 1435 ax-10 1436 ax-11 1437 ax-i12 1438 ax-bndl 1439 ax-4 1440 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 ax-i5r 1468 ax-ext 2063 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-cleq 2074 df-clel 2077 df-nfc 2208 df-ral 2353 |
This theorem is referenced by: ralcom 2517 ssiinf 3727 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |