Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rexbii2 | GIF version |
Description: Inference adding different restricted existential quantifiers to each side of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rexbii2.1 | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rexbii2 | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rexbii2.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
2 | 1 | exbii 1536 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) |
3 | df-rex 2354 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
4 | df-rex 2354 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
5 | 2, 3, 4 | 3bitr4i 210 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 102 ↔ wb 103 ∃wex 1421 ∈ wcel 1433 ∃wrex 2349 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-5 1376 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-4 1440 ax-ial 1467 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-rex 2354 |
This theorem is referenced by: rexeqbii 2379 rexbiia 2381 rexrab 2755 rexdifsn 3521 bnd2 3947 rexuz2 8669 rexrp 8756 rexuz3 9876 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |