Theorem sb7af 1910

Description: An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1686. Similar to dfsb7a 1911 but does not require that 𝜑 and 𝑧 be distinct. Similar to sb7f 1909 in that it involves a dummy variable 𝑧, but expressed in terms of ∀ rather than ∃. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sb7af.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb7af	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem sb7af

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb6 1807	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))
2	1	sbbii 1688	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))
3		sb7af.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
4	3	sbco2 1880	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
5		sb6 1807	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr3i 208	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 103  ∀wal 1282  Ⅎwnf 1389  [wsb 1685

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686

This theorem is referenced by:  dfsb7a  1911