Theorem sb7f 1909

Description: This version of dfsb7 1908 does not require that 𝜑 and 𝑧 be distinct. This permits it to be used as a definition for substitution in a formalization that omits the logically redundant axiom ax-17 1459 i.e. that doesn't have the concept of a variable not occurring in a wff. (df-sb 1686 is also suitable, but its mixing of free and bound variables is distasteful to some logicians.) (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sb7f.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb7f	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem sb7f

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb5 1808	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
2	1	sbbii 1688	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
3		sb7f.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)
4	3	sbco2v 1862	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
5		sb5 1808	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr3i 208	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103  ∀wal 1282  ∃wex 1421  [wsb 1685

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686

This theorem is referenced by: (None)