![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ss2rab | GIF version |
Description: Restricted abstraction classes in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1999.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ss2rab | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2357 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | df-rab 2357 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} | |
3 | 1, 2 | sseq12i 3025 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) |
4 | ss2ab 3062 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) | |
5 | df-ral 2353 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | |
6 | imdistan 432 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) | |
7 | 6 | albii 1399 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) |
8 | 5, 7 | bitr2i 183 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
9 | 3, 4, 8 | 3bitri 204 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ↔ wb 103 ∀wal 1282 ∈ wcel 1433 {cab 2067 ∀wral 2348 {crab 2352 ⊆ wss 2973 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-io 662 ax-5 1376 ax-7 1377 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-8 1435 ax-10 1436 ax-11 1437 ax-i12 1438 ax-bndl 1439 ax-4 1440 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 ax-i5r 1468 ax-ext 2063 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-clab 2068 df-cleq 2074 df-clel 2077 df-nfc 2208 df-ral 2353 df-rab 2357 df-in 2979 df-ss 2986 |
This theorem is referenced by: ss2rabdv 3075 ss2rabi 3076 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |