Theorem ax12w 2010

Description: Weak version of ax-12 2047 from which we can prove any ax-12 2047 instance not involving wff variables or bundling. Uses only Tarski's FOL axiom schemes. An instance of the first hypothesis will normally require that x and y be distinct (unless x does not occur in ph). For an example of how the hypotheses can be eliminated when we substitute an expression without wff variables for ph, see ax12wdemo 2012. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ax12w.1	|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
ax12w.2	|- ( y = z -> ( ph <-> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax12w	|- ( x = y -> ( A. y ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )

Distinct variable groups:   y, z   ps, x   ph, z   ch, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   ps( y, z)   ch( x, z)

Proof of Theorem ax12w

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax12w.2	. . 3 |- ( y = z -> ( ph <-> ch ) )
2	1	spw 1967	. 2 |- ( A. y ph -> ph )
3		ax12w.1	. . 3 |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
4	3	ax12wlem 2009	. 2 |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
5	2, 4	syl5 34	1 |- ( x = y -> ( A. y ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 196   A.wal 1481

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 386  df-ex 1705

This theorem is referenced by:  ax12wdemo  2012