Theorem dfoprab3s 7223

Description: A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3s	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑤   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3s

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab2 6701	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
2		nfsbc1v 3455	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
3	2	19.41 2103	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
4		sbcopeq1a 7220	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ([(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
5	4	pm5.32i 669	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
6	5	exbii 1774	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
7		nfcv 2764	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(1st ‘𝑤)
8		nfsbc1v 3455	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
9	7, 8	nfsbc 3457	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
10	9	19.41 2103	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
11	6, 10	bitr3i 266	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
12	11	exbii 1774	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
13		elvv 5177	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
14	13	anbi1i 731	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
15	3, 12, 14	3bitr4i 292	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
16	15	opabbii 4717	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
17	1, 16	eqtri 2644	1 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  Vcvv 3200  [wsbc 3435  ⟨cop 4183  {copab 4712   × cxp 5112  ‘cfv 5888  {coprab 6651  1^st c1st 7166  2^nd c2nd 7167

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fv 5896  df-oprab 6654  df-1st 7168  df-2nd 7169

This theorem is referenced by:  dfoprab3  7224