Theorem inex3 34106

Description: More general sethood condition for the intersection relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inex3	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem inex3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inex1g 4801	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
2		inex2ALTV 34105	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
3	1, 2	jaoi 394	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 383   ∈ wcel 1990  Vcvv 3200   ∩ cin 3573

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-v 3202  df-in 3581

This theorem is referenced by: (None)