Theorem nffvd 6200

Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nffv 6198. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nffvd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐹)
nffvd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nffvd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴))

Proof of Theorem nffvd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfaba1 2770	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}
2		nfaba1 2770	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}
3	1, 2	nffv 6198	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥({𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}‘{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
4		nffvd.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐹)
5		nffvd.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
6		nfnfc1 2767	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
7		nfnfc1 2767	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
8	6, 7	nfan 1828	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
9		abidnf 3375	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹} = 𝐹)
10	9	adantr 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹} = 𝐹)
11		abidnf 3375	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
12	11	adantl 482	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
13	10, 12	fveq12d 6197	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) → ({𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}‘{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
14	8, 13	nfceqdf 2760	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) → (Ⅎ𝑥({𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}‘{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) ↔ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴)))
15	4, 5, 14	syl2anc 693	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Ⅎ𝑥({𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}‘{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) ↔ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴)))
16	3, 15	mpbii 223	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384  ∀wal 1481   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608  Ⅎwnfc 2751  ‘cfv 5888

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-iota 5851  df-fv 5896

This theorem is referenced by:  nfovd  6675  nfixp  7927