Theorem orngmul 29803

Description: In an ordered ring, the ordering is compatible with the ring multiplication operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
orngmul.0	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
orngmul.1	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅)
orngmul.2	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)
orngmul.3	⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
orngmul	⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑌))

Proof of Theorem orngmul

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp2r 1088	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)) → 0 ≤ 𝑋)
2		simp3r 1090	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)) → 0 ≤ 𝑌)
3		simp2l 1087	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
4		simp3l 1089	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
5		orngmul.0	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
6		orngmul.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)
7		orngmul.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)
8		orngmul.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅)
9	5, 6, 7, 8	isorng 29799	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑅 ∈ oGrp ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (( 0 ≤ 𝑎 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) → 0 ≤ (𝑎 · 𝑏))))
10	9	simp3bi 1078	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (( 0 ≤ 𝑎 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) → 0 ≤ (𝑎 · 𝑏)))
11	10	3ad2ant1 1082	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)) → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (( 0 ≤ 𝑎 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) → 0 ≤ (𝑎 · 𝑏)))
12		breq2 4657	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → ( 0 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ 0 ≤ 𝑋))
13	12	anbi1d 741	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (( 0 ≤ 𝑎 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) ↔ ( 0 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏)))
14		oveq1 6657	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝑎 · 𝑏) = (𝑋 · 𝑏))
15	14	breq2d 4665	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → ( 0 ≤ (𝑎 · 𝑏) ↔ 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑏)))
16	13, 15	imbi12d 334	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → ((( 0 ≤ 𝑎 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) → 0 ≤ (𝑎 · 𝑏)) ↔ (( 0 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑏))))
17		breq2 4657	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → ( 0 ≤ 𝑏 ↔ 0 ≤ 𝑌))
18	17	anbi2d 740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (( 0 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) ↔ ( 0 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)))
19		oveq2 6658	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝑋 · 𝑏) = (𝑋 · 𝑌))
20	19	breq2d 4665	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → ( 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑏) ↔ 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑌)))
21	18, 20	imbi12d 334	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → ((( 0 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑏)) ↔ (( 0 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑌))))
22	16, 21	rspc2va 3323	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (( 0 ≤ 𝑎 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) → 0 ≤ (𝑎 · 𝑏))) → (( 0 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑌)))
23	3, 4, 11, 22	syl21anc 1325	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)) → (( 0 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑌)))
24	1, 2, 23	mp2and 715	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑌))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  ∀wral 2912   class class class wbr 4653  ‘cfv 5888  (class class class)co 6650  Basecbs 15857  ._rcmulr 15942  lecple 15948  0_gc0g 16100  Ringcrg 18547  oGrpcogrp 29698  oRingcorng 29795

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-nul 4789

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-iota 5851  df-fv 5896  df-ov 6653  df-orng 29797

This theorem is referenced by:  orngsqr  29804  ornglmulle  29805  orngrmulle  29806  orngmullt  29809  suborng  29815