oteqimp - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > oteqimp		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem oteqimp 7187

Description: The components of an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
oteqimp	⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍) → ((1^st ‘(1^st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐴 ∧ (2^nd ‘(1^st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐵 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑇) = 𝐶)))

**Proof of Theorem oteqimp**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ot1stg 7182	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍) → (1^st ‘(1^st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐴)
2		ot2ndg 7183	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍) → (2^nd ‘(1^st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐵)
3		ot3rdg 7184	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑍 → (2^nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩) = 𝐶)
4	3	3ad2ant3 1084	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍) → (2^nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩) = 𝐶)
5	1, 2, 4	3jca 1242	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍) → ((1^st ‘(1^st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐴 ∧ (2^nd ‘(1^st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐵 ∧ (2^nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩) = 𝐶))
6		fveq2 6191	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → (1^st ‘𝑇) = (1^st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩))
7	6	fveq2d 6195	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → (1^st ‘(1^st ‘𝑇)) = (1^st ‘(1^st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)))
8	7	eqeq1d 2624	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → ((1^st ‘(1^st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐴 ↔ (1^st ‘(1^st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐴))
9	6	fveq2d 6195	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → (2^nd ‘(1^st ‘𝑇)) = (2^nd ‘(1^st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)))
10	9	eqeq1d 2624	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → ((2^nd ‘(1^st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐵 ↔ (2^nd ‘(1^st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐵))
11		fveq2 6191	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → (2^nd ‘𝑇) = (2^nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩))
12	11	eqeq1d 2624	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → ((2^nd ‘𝑇) = 𝐶 ↔ (2^nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩) = 𝐶))
13	8, 10, 12	3anbi123d 1399	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → (((1^st ‘(1^st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐴 ∧ (2^nd ‘(1^st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐵 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑇) = 𝐶) ↔ ((1^st ‘(1^st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐴 ∧ (2^nd ‘(1^st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐵 ∧ (2^nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩) = 𝐶)))
14	5, 13	syl5ibr 236	1 ⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍) → ((1^st ‘(1^st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐴 ∧ (2^nd ‘(1^st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐵 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑇) = 𝐶)))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ w3a 1037 = wceq 1483 ∈ wcel 1990 ⟨cotp 4185 ‘cfv 5888 1^st c1st 7166 2^nd c2nd 7167

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1722 ax-4 1737 ax-5 1839 ax-6 1888 ax-7 1935 ax-8 1992 ax-9 1999 ax-10 2019 ax-11 2034 ax-12 2047 ax-13 2246 ax-ext 2602 ax-sep 4781 ax-nul 4789 ax-pow 4843 ax-pr 4906 ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 385 df-an 386 df-3an 1039 df-tru 1486 df-ex 1705 df-nf 1710 df-sb 1881 df-eu 2474 df-mo 2475 df-clab 2609 df-cleq 2615 df-clel 2618 df-nfc 2753 df-ral 2917 df-rex 2918 df-rab 2921 df-v 3202 df-sbc 3436 df-dif 3577 df-un 3579 df-in 3581 df-ss 3588 df-nul 3916 df-if 4087 df-sn 4178 df-pr 4180 df-op 4184 df-ot 4186 df-uni 4437 df-br 4654 df-opab 4713 df-mpt 4730 df-id 5024 df-xp 5120 df-rel 5121 df-cnv 5122 df-co 5123 df-dm 5124 df-rn 5125 df-iota 5851 df-fun 5890 df-fv 5896 df-1st 7168 df-2nd 7169

This theorem is referenced by: (None)

W3C validator