Theorem rabexgf 39183

Description: A version of rabexg 4812 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rabexgf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabexgf	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem rabexgf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 2921	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
2		simpl 473	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
3	2	ss2abi 3674	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}
4		rabexgf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
5	4	abid2f 2791	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
6	3, 5	sseqtri 3637	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐴
7	1, 6	eqsstri 3635	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴
8		ssexg 4804	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)
9	7, 8	mpan 706	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608  Ⅎwnfc 2751  {crab 2916  Vcvv 3200   ⊆ wss 3574

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588

This theorem is referenced by:  rabexf  39319  stoweidlem27  40244  stoweidlem35  40252