Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39101-39200 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|
| Statement |
|---|
| |
| Theorem | ancomstVD 39101 |
Closed form of ancoms 469. The following user's proof is completed by
invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all
remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))
| | qed:1,?: e0a 38999 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒))
|
The proof of ancomst 468 is derived automatically from it.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)) |
| |
| Theorem | ssralv2VD 39102* |
Quantification restricted to a subclass for two quantifiers. ssralv 3666
for two quantifiers. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction
proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ssralv2 38737 is ssralv2VD 39102 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ssralv2VD 39102.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 4:3,2: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 8:7,6: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 )
| | 10:9,8: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑 )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
→ ∀𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷))
| | 13:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑
→ ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑)
| | 14:12,13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
▶ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | qed:16: | ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | ordelordALTVD 39103 |
An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 36. This is an alternate proof of ordelord 5745 using
the Axiom of Regularity indirectly through dford2 8517. dford2 is a
weaker definition of ordinal number. Given the Axiom of Regularity, it
need not be assumed that E Fr 𝐴 because this is inferred by the
Axiom of Regularity. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction
proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ordelordALT 38747 is ordelordALTVD 39103
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from
ordelordALTVD 39103 using the tools program
translate..without..overwriting.cmd and Metamath's minimize command.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (Ord 𝐴
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Ord 𝐴 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐴 )
| | 5:2: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 6:4,3: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 )
| | 7:6,6,5: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 11:10: | ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 14:13: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 15:14,5: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 16:4,15,3: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐵 )
| | 17:16,7: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Ord 𝐵 )
| | qed:17: | ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | equncomVD 39104 |
If a class equals the union of two other classes, then it equals the
union of those two classes commuted. The following User's Proof is a
Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncom 3758 is equncomVD 39104 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomVD 39104.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) )
| | 6:5,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶))
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | equncomiVD 39105 |
Inference form of equncom 3758. The following User's Proof is a
Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncomi 3759 is equncomiVD 39105 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomiVD 39105.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)
| | qed:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sucidALTVD 39106 |
A set belongs to its successor. Alternate proof of sucid 5804.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof
completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sucidALT 39107 is sucidALTVD 39106
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from
sucidALTVD 39106. This proof illustrates that
completeusersproof.cmd will generate a Metamath proof from any
User's Proof which is "conventional" in the sense that no step
is a virtual deduction, provided that all necessary unification
theorems and transformation deductions are in set.mm.
completeusersproof.cmd automatically converts such a
conventional proof into a Virtual Deduction proof for which each
step happens to be a 0-virtual hypothesis virtual deduction.
The user does not need to search for reference theorem labels or
deduction labels nor does he(she) need to use theorems and
deductions which unify with reference theorems and deductions in
set.mm. All that is necessary is that each theorem or deduction
of the User's Proof unifies with some reference theorem or
deduction in set.mm or is a semantic variation of some theorem
or deduction which unifies with some reference theorem or
deduction in set.mm. The definition of "semantic variation" has
not been precisely defined. If it is obvious that a theorem or
deduction has the same meaning as another theorem or deduction,
then it is a semantic variation of the latter theorem or
deduction. For example, step 4 of the User's Proof is a
semantic variation of the definition (axiom)
suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}), which unifies with df-suc 5729, a
reference definition (axiom) in set.mm. Also, a theorem or
deduction is said to be a semantic variation of another
theorem or deduction if it is obvious upon cursory inspection
that it has the same meaning as a weaker form of the latter
theorem or deduction. For example, the deduction Ord 𝐴
infers ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) is a
semantic variation of the theorem (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))), which unifies with
the set.mm reference definition (axiom) dford2 8517.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
| | 3:2: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ({𝐴} ∪ 𝐴)
| | 4:: | ⊢ suc 𝐴 = ({𝐴} ∪ 𝐴)
| | qed:3,4: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sucidALT 39107 |
A set belongs to its successor. This proof was automatically derived
from sucidALTVD 39106 using translatewithout_overwriting.cmd and
minimizing. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sucidVD 39108 |
A set belongs to its successor. The following User's Proof is a
Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools
program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2
and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sucid 5804 is sucidVD 39108 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sucidVD 39108.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
| | 3:2: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
| | 4:: | ⊢ suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
| | qed:3,4: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | imbi12VD 39109 |
Implication form of imbi12i 340.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
imbi12 336 is imbi12VD 39109 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from imbi12VD 39109.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜒) )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜒) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜃) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜃) )
| | 8:1,7: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜃) )
| | 9:2,8: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜒) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 11:6,10: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | imbi13VD 39110 |
Join three logical equivalences to form equivalence of implications.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
imbi13 38726 is imbi13VD 39110 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from imbi13VD 39110.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ ((𝜒 → 𝜏) ↔ (𝜃 → 𝜂)) )
| | 5:1,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂)))) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂))))) )
| | qed:7: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂))))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcim2gVD 39111 |
Distribution of class substitution over a left-nested implication.
Similar to sbcimg 3477.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcim2g 38748 is sbcim2gVD 39111 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcim2gVD 39111.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)
↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒))) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒))) )
| | 12:6,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
→ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcbiVD 39112 |
Implication form of sbcbiiOLD 38741.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcbi 38749 is sbcbiVD 39112 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcbiVD 39112.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)) )
| | qed:5: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | trsbcVD 39113* |
Formula-building inference rule for class substitution, substituting a
class variable for the setvar variable of the transitivity predicate.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
trsbc 38750 is trsbcVD 39113 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from trsbcVD 39113.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥
↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 5:1,2,3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))) )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 →
([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))) )
| | 7:5,6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 10:: | ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ∀𝑥((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 12:1,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 13:9,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 16:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 17:15,16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 20:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 22:: | ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 23:21,22: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ Tr 𝐴) )
| | 24:: | ⊢ (Tr 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦
∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(Tr 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 26:1,25: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 27:23,26: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ Tr 𝐴) )
| | qed:27: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ Tr 𝐴))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 ↔ Tr 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | truniALTVD 39114* |
The union of a class of transitive sets is transitive.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
truniALT 38751 is truniALTVD 39114 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from truniALTVD 39114.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
Tr 𝑥 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ∃𝑞(𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 8:6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 9:1,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ [𝑞 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝑞 )
| | 11:3,7,10: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 12:11,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞((𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ (∃𝑞(𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 16:5,15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥
▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ Tr ∪ 𝐴 )
| | qed:19: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∪ 𝐴)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∪
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ee33VD 39115 |
Non-virtual deduction form of e33 38961.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
ee33 38727 is ee33VD 39115 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from ee33VD 39115.
| h1:: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
| | h2:: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))
| | h3:: | ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
| | 5:4: | ⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
| | 6:2,5: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓
→ (𝜒 → 𝜂))))))
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜂)))))
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
| | qed:8: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) |
| |
| Theorem | trintALTVD 39116* |
The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Virtual
deduction proof of trintALT 39117.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
trintALT 39117 is trintALTVD 39116 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from trintALTVD 39116.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 8:7,6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 9:7,1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ [𝑞 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 )
| | 10:7,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ Tr 𝑞 )
| | 11:10,3,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞(𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 15:3,14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦
∈ ∩ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ Tr ∩ 𝐴 )
| | qed:18: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩ 𝐴)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | trintALT 39117* |
The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Exercise
5(b) of [Enderton] p. 73. trintALT 39117 is an alternate proof of trint 4768.
trintALT 39117 is trintALTVD 39116 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from trintALTVD 39116 using the tools program
translate..without..overwriting.cmd and Metamath's minimize command.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | undif3VD 39118 |
The first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Virtual
deduction proof of undif3 3888.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
undif3 3888 is undif3VD 39118 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from undif3VD 39118.
| 1:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)))
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐶))
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥
∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 7:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧
(¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (
¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 10:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 12:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
)
| | 13:11: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 14:12: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ((𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 17:9,16: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
→ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 18:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 20:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
)
| | 21:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 23:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 27:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 28:27: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 29:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 31:30: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 32:31: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 33:22,26: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 34:28,32: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 35:33,34: | ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
→ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 36:: | ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 37:36,35: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 38:17,37: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 39:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐴))
| | 40:39: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 41:: | ⊢ (¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥
∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 42:40,41: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥
∈ 𝐴))
| | 43:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
))
| | 44:43,42: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)
) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 45:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ (
𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | 46:45,44: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ (
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 47:4,38: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 48:46,47: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴
∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | 49:48: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈
((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | qed:49: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶
∖ 𝐴))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcssgVD 39119 |
Virtual deduction proof of sbcssg 4085.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcssg 4085 is sbcssgVD 39119 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcssgVD 39119.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷
)) )
| | 5:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)
) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)
) )
| | 11:: | ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))
| | 110:11: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈
𝐷))
| | 12:1,110: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 13:10,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷 ↔ ∀
𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbingVD 39120 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbingOLD 39054.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbingOLD 39054 is csbingVD 39120 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbingVD 39120.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)
}
| | 20:2: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦
∈ 𝐷)}
| | 30:1,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 3:1,30: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷
)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 10:9,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)} )
| | 13:5,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)} )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) = {
𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)}
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem5VD 39121* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem5 38757.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem5 38757 is onfrALTlem5VD 39121 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem5VD 39121.
| 1:: | ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∈ V
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
| | 4:3: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
| | 5:: | ⊢ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) = ∅)
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)
| | 7:2: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 8:: | ⊢ (𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ∀𝑏(𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 10:2,9: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 11:7,10: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅)
| | 12:6,11: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ (
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)
| | 13:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥))
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅))
| | 15:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅))
| | 16:15,14: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
≠ ∅))
| | 17:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = (
⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 ∩ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦)
| | 18:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 = (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
| | 19:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦 = 𝑦
| | 20:18,19: | ⊢ (⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 ∩ ⦋(𝑎
∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦) = ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
| | 21:17,20: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ((
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
| | 22:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) =
∅ ↔ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌
∅)
| | 23:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌∅ = ∅
| | 24:21,23: | ⊢ (⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) =
⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌∅ ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 25:22,24: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) =
∅ ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 26:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ 𝑦 ∈
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥))
| | 27:25,26: | ⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ [
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 28:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
/ 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 29:27,28: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) =
∅))
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ∀𝑦([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅))
| | 31:30: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 32:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅
))
| | 33:31,32: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
= ∅)
| | 34:2: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (
𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 35:33,34: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅)
| | 36:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦
(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 37:36: | ⊢ ∀𝑏(∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔
∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 38:2,37: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦)
= ∅))
| | 39:35,38: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 40:16,39: | ⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠
∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 41:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎
∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) /
𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | qed:40,41: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢
([(𝑎 ∩
𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem4VD 39122* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem4 38758.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem4 38758 is onfrALTlem4VD 39122 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem4VD 39122.
| 1:: | ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ↔ ⦋
𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌∅)
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌
𝑎 ∩ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥)
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑎 = 𝑎
| | 5:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥 = 𝑦
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑎 ∩ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥) = (
𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)
| | 7:3,6: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)
| | 8:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌∅ = ∅
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌
∅ ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 10:2,9: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ↔ (𝑎
∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 11:1: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑎)
| | 12:11,10: | ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥](
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) =
∅) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅))
| | qed:13,12: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) =
∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem3VD 39123* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem3 38759.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem3 38759 is onfrALTlem3VD 39123 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem3VD 39123.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎
⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ 𝑎 ⊆
On )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ On )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ Ord 𝑥 )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ E We 𝑥 )
| | 8:: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑥
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ E We (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ E Fr (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∀𝑏((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠
∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 13:12,8: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∈ V
| | 14:13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 15:: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)(
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 16:14,15: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) =
∅) )
| | 17:: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
| | 18:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅ )
| | 20:17,19: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ≠ ∅) )
| | qed:16,20: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅ )
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ) |
| |
| Theorem | simplbi2comtVD 39124 |
Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2comt 656.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
simplbi2comt 656 is simplbi2comtVD 39124 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from simplbi2comtVD 39124.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ (
𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒
) → 𝜑) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜑)) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜒 → (𝜓
→ 𝜑)) )
| | qed:4: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → (𝜒 → (𝜓
→ 𝜑)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem2VD 39125* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem2 38761.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem2 38761 is onfrALTlem2VD 39125 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem2VD 39125.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎
⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 7:4: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ 𝑎 ⊆
On )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ On )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ Ord 𝑥 )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ Tr 𝑥 )
| | 11:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 13:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 14:10,12,13: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 15:3,14: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 16:13,15: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) → 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) → 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) )
| | 20:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 22:19,21: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 23:20: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 25:22,24: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) )
| | 27:26: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∀𝑦((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) )
| | 28:27: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) )
| | 29:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅ )
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 31:28,30: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | qed:31: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem1VD 39126* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem1 38763.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem1 38763 is onfrALTlem1VD 39126 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem1VD 39126.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
)
| | 4:: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅
) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
= ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 6:5: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
= ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 7:3,6: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(
𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | qed:7,8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTVD 39127 |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALT 38764.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALT 38764 is onfrALTVD 39127 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTVD 39127.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎
∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎
∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ▶
(¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ▶
((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ∨ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) =
∅)
| | 6:5,4,3: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ▶
∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎
→ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥
∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (∃𝑥𝑥
∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 10:: | ⊢ (𝑎 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝑎)
| | 11:9,10: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ≠
∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ⊆
On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ 𝑎 ≠
∅ )
| | 14:13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈
𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦
∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | qed:16: | ⊢ E Fr On
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ E Fr
On |
| |
| Theorem | csbeq2gVD 39128 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbeq2gOLD 38765.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbeq2gOLD 38765 is csbeq2gVD 39128 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbeq2gVD 39128.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]
𝐵 = 𝐶) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥
⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | qed:4: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌
𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbsngVD 39129 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbsng 4243.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbsng 4243 is csbsngVD 39129 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from csbsngVD 39129.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵
↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦 )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵
↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦
= 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 =
𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 8:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 =
𝐵} = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵} )
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦
= 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 10:: | ⊢ {𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ∀𝑥{𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}
| | 12:1,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵} )
| | 13:9,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {
𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 14:: | ⊢ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵}
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) |
| |
| Theorem | csbxpgVD 39130 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbxpgOLD 39053.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbxpgOLD 39053 is csbxpgVD 39130 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbxpgVD 39130.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ↔
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 = 𝑤 )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑤
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌𝐶 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 9:6,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 10:5,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) )
| | 11:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 12:10,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) )
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤 ,
𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩) )
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩
∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 15:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩
∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))) )
| | 16:14,15: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 19:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))) )
| | 20:18,19: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑤([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 23:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦
(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))) )
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃
𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃
𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
)
| | 27:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃
𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]
∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} )
| | 28:26,27: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃
𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
)
| | 29:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)}
= {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
| | 30:: | ⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)}
| | 31:29,30: | ⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
| | 32:31: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
| | 33:1,32: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) =
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} )
| | 34:28,33: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) =
{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))} )
| | 35:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
| | 36:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = {
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)}
| | 37:35,36: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = {𝑧
∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
| | 38:34,37: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | qed:38: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbresgVD 39131 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbresgOLD 39055.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbresgOLD 39055 is csbresgVD 39131 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbresgVD 39131.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌V = V )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌V) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌V) )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V)) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 ×
V)) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V)) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 ×
V)) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)) )
| | 9:: | ⊢ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V))
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V))
| | 11:1,10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) =
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V)) )
| | 12:8,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)
= (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)) )
| | 13:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V))
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) =
(
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | qed:14: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbrngVD 39132 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbrngOLD 39056.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbrngOLD 39056 is csbrngVD 39132 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbrngVD 39132.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩
∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩
∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑤([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 ,
𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 ,
𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 8:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 ,
𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨
𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 12:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} )
| | 13:11,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 14:: | ⊢ ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵}
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ∀𝑥ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩
∈ 𝐵}
| | 16:1,15: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} )
| | 17:13,16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣
∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 18:: | ⊢ ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}
| | 19:17,18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 )
| | qed:19: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | csbima12gALTVD 39133 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbima12gALTOLD 39057.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbima12gALTOLD 39057 is csbima12gALTVD 39133 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbima12gALTVD 39133.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) =
(
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶
ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
= ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
= ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
= ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 6:: | ⊢ (𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
| | 8:1,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) )
| | 9:5,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) =
ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 10:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) = ran
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
| | 11:9,10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | qed:11: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbunigVD 39134 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbunigOLD 39051.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbunigOLD 39051 is csbunigVD 39134 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbunigVD 39134.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧
∈ 𝑦) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 5:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)} )
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
)
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)} )
| | 15:: | ⊢ ∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ∀𝑥∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
𝐵)}
| | 17:1,16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣
∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} )
| | 18:1,17: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} )
| | 19:14,18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣
∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)} )
| | 20:: | ⊢ ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵 )
| | qed:21: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪
𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | csbfv12gALTVD 39135 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbfv12gALTOLD 39052.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbfv12gALTOLD 39052 is csbfv12gALTVD 39135 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbfv12gALTVD 39135.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦} = {
𝑦} )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵
}) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵}) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌{𝐵}) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) )
| | 6:3,5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵
}) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {
𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦}) )
| | 8:6,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {
𝐵}) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})
= {𝑦}) )
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {
𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦})
)
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹
“ {𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦}) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹
“ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦}} )
| | 12:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹
“ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} )
| | 13:11,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹
“ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦
}} )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (
𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “
{⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦}} )
| | 15:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ (
𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) =
{𝑦}} )
| | 16:14,15: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ (
𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} =
∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦}} )
| | 17:: | ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐵) =
∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) =
{𝑦}}
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐹‘𝐵) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵
}) = {𝑦}}
| | 19:1,18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵)
= ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} )
| | 20:16,19: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵)
= ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}} )
| | 21:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) =
∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}
| | 22:20,21: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵)
= (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | qed:22: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | con5VD 39136 |
Virtual deduction proof of con5 38728.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
con5 38728 is con5VD 39136 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from con5VD 39136.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓
) )
| | 4:: | ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) )
| | qed:5: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| |
| Theorem | relopabVD 39137 |
Virtual deduction proof of relopab 5247.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
relopab 5247 is relopabVD 39137 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from relopabVD 39137.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑣 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 ▶ ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑣
⟩ )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑢 )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ ⟨𝑥 , 𝑣⟩ = ⟨
𝑢, 𝑣⟩ )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ = ⟨
𝑢, 𝑣⟩ )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦
⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 ,
𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦
⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)))
| | 9:8: | ⊢ (∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑣(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧
= ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)))
| | 90:: | ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 91:90: | ⊢ (∃𝑣𝑣 = 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 92:: | ⊢ ∃𝑣𝑣 = 𝑦
| | 10:91,92: | ⊢ ∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣
| | 11:9,10: | ⊢ ∃𝑣(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ →
𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 12:11: | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ →
𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 13:: | ⊢ (∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢
, 𝑣⟩) → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣
𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 15:14: | ⊢ (∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑢(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦
⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 150:: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑢)
| | 151:150: | ⊢ (∃𝑢𝑢 = 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢)
| | 152:: | ⊢ ∃𝑢𝑢 = 𝑥
| | 16:151,152: | ⊢ ∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢
| | 17:15,16: | ⊢ ∃𝑢(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨
𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 18:17: | ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨
𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 19:18: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑦∃𝑢
∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 20:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ →
∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧
= ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 22:21: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑥
∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 23:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ →
∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢
∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 25:24: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩} ⊆
{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩}
| | 26:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 27:: | ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
| | 28:26,27: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)
| | 29:28: | ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦
⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
| | 30:29: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
| | 31:30: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥
∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
| | 32:31: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩} = {
𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))}
| | 320:25,32: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩}
| | 33:: | ⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
| | 34:: | ⊢ 𝑣 ∈ V
| | 35:33,34: | ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)
| | 36:35: | ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣
⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
| | 37:36: | ⊢ (∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑧 =
⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
| | 38:37: | ⊢ (∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ↔ ∃𝑢
∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
| | 39:38: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩} = {
𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))}
| | 40:320,39: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧
(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))}
| | 41:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V
)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))
}
| | 42:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V
)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))
}
| | 43:40,41,42: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V
)} ⊆ {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)}
| | 44:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V
)} = (V × V)
| | 45:43,44: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V
)} ⊆ (V × V)
| | 46:28: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))
| | 47:46: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩
∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)}
| | 48:45,47: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ (V × V)
| | qed:48: | ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 9-Jul-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ Rel
{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | 19.41rgVD 39138 |
Virtual deduction proof of 19.41rg 38766.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. 19.41rg 38766
is 19.41rgVD 39138 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from 19.41rgVD 39138. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ((𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ∀𝑥((𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (𝜓 → (𝜑
→ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
| | 4:3: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜓 →
∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓) )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (∀𝑥𝜓
→ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) , ∀𝑥𝜓 ▶
∀𝑥𝜓 )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) , ∀𝑥𝜓 ▶
∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) , ∀𝑥𝜓 ▶
(∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (∀𝑥𝜓
→ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 11:5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (𝜓 → ∀
𝑥𝜓) )
| | 12:10,11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (𝜓 → (
∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (∃𝑥𝜑
→ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ ((∃𝑥
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | qed:14: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ((∃𝑥𝜑
∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
|
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | 2pm13.193VD 39139 |
Virtual deduction proof of 2pm13.193 38768.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
2pm13.193 38768 is 2pm13.193VD 39139 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from 2pm13.193VD 39139. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
8-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑢 )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 8:2: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑣 )
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 12:2,11: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣
/ 𝑦]𝜑) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 14:: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ((
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ (𝑥
= 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ 𝑦 =
𝑣 )
| | 17:14: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ 𝜑
)
| | 18:16,17: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ([
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 20:15: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ 𝑥 =
𝑢 )
| | 21:19: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ [𝑣
/ 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 22:20,21: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ([
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢) )
| | 23:22: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ([
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ [𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 25:15,24: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ((
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) → ((𝑥
= 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | qed:13,26: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣
/ 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
|
|
| ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | hbimpgVD 39140 |
Virtual deduction proof of hbimpg 38770.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbimpg 38770
is hbimpgVD 39140 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from hbimpgVD 39140. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 →
∀𝑥𝜓)) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 6:3,5: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑 )
| | 7:: | ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (∀𝑥¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
| | 9:6,8: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | 11:: | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
| | 12:11: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) )
| | 15:14,12: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | 16:10,15: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | 17:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
| | 18:16,17: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | 19:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥(
𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 20:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥(
𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥(∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 →
∀𝑥𝜓)))
| | 22:21,18: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | qed:22: | ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
|
|
| ⊢
((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | hbalgVD 39141 |
Virtual deduction proof of hbalg 38771.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbalg 38771
is hbalgVD 39141 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from hbalgVD 39141. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦(𝜑
→ ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∀𝑦𝜑
→ ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∀𝑦𝜑
→ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦∀𝑦(
𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 6:5,4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦(∀
𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑) )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦
𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑))
|
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | hbexgVD 39142 |
Virtual deduction proof of hbexg 38772.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbexg 38772
is hbexgVD 39142 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from hbexgVD 39142. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦
∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 6:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦
∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 7:5: | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔
∀𝑦∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 8:5,6,7: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦
∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 9:8,4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
(∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∀
𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥
∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
(∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
(¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (¬
∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 18:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)
| | 19:17,18: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∃
𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 20:18: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∃
𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | 22:8,21: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | 23:14,22: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | qed:23: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
|
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | ax6e2eqVD 39143* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 38785)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2eq 38773 is ax6e2eqVD 39143 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2eqVD 39143.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑢 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑢 )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑢) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢)) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑢)))
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)))
| | 9:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)))
| | 11:1,10: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑥
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)) )
| | 13:: | ⊢ ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢
| | 14:13,12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢
) )
| | 140:14: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)
)
| | 141:140: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑢))
| | 15:1,141: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 16:1,15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 19:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ 𝑢 = 𝑣 )
| | 20:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ (𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑢
)
| | 22:19,21: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑣
)
| | 23:20: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑢
)
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ (𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → (
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ ∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)
→ (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 27:26: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)
→ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 28:27: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ ∀𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑢) → ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 29:28: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑢) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 30:29: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢
) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 31:18,30: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | qed:31: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
|
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))) |
| |
| Theorem | ax6e2ndVD 39144* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 38785)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2nd 38774 is ax6e2ndVD 39144 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2ndVD 39144.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ∃𝑦𝑦 = 𝑣
| | 2:: | ⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑦𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 5:: | ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢)
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ (∃𝑥𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑦
(∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ ∃𝑦(∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 9:: | ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑧 = 𝑣)
| | 10:: | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑧𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 11:: | ⊢ ( 𝑧 = 𝑦 ▶ 𝑧 = 𝑦 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝑧 = 𝑦 ▶ (𝑧 = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 120:11: | ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 13:9,10,120: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦
= 𝑣))
| | 14:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 15:14,13: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥
𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦
= 𝑣))
| | 17:16: | ⊢ (∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣
→ ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 18:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 19:17,18: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀
𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 20:14,19: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣 →
∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 23:22: | ⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦((∃𝑥
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 24:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 25:23,24: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦((∃𝑥𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 26:14,25: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑦((∃𝑥𝑥
= 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 27:26: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (∃𝑦(∃𝑥𝑥
= 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 28:8,27: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 29:28: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | qed:29: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
|
|
| ⊢ (¬
∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) |
| |
| Theorem | ax6e2ndeqVD 39145* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 38785)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2eq 38773 is ax6e2ndeqVD 39145 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2ndeqVD 39145.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ (
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ 𝑥
= 𝑢 )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ 𝑥
≠ 𝑣 )
| | 5:2: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ 𝑦
= 𝑣 )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ 𝑥
≠ 𝑦 )
| | 7:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 9:: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦)
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 11:6,10: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶
¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
→ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ ∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) → ∃𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 15:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 19:15: | ⊢ (∃𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 =
𝑦)
| | 20:14,19: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ ∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 23:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃
𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 25:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 26:25: | ⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦∀𝑦¬
∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 260:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦∀𝑦¬
∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 27:260: | ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑦¬
∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 270:26,27: | ⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥
𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 28:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 29:270,28: | ⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 30:24,29: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 31:30: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)) )
| | 32:31: | ⊢ (𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
| | 33:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ 𝑢 = 𝑣 )
| | 34:33: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣) )
| | 35:34: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)) )
| | 36:35: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
| | 37:: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)
| | 38:32,36,37: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (
¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣))
| | 39:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 40:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 41:40: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃
𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 42:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 43:39,41,42: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣
))
| | 44:40,43: | ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥
∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | qed:38,44: | ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥
∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
|
|
| ⊢ ((¬
∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) |
| |
| Theorem | 2sb5ndVD 39146* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 38785)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. 2sb5nd 38776 is 2sb5ndVD 39146 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from 2sb5ndVD 39146.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Apr-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 2:1: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 /
𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 3:: | ⊢ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 4:3: | ⊢ [𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑣
/ 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑢 / 𝑥]
∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 7:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥)
| | 9:6,8: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥]∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀
𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 11:5,10: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 12:11: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 /
𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 13:: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 14:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (∀𝑥[𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) )
| | 16:13,15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦
]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]
𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 19:12,17: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 20:19: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 /
𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 21:2,20: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)
↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 22:21: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 23:13: | ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 240:24: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)) ↔
(∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
𝜑)))
| | 241:: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)) ↔
(∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 242:241,240: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
| | 243:: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
𝜑))) ↔ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))))
| | 25:242,243: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ([
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
| | 26:: | ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥
∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | qed:25,26: | ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
|
|
| ⊢ ((¬
∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | 2uasbanhVD 39147* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 38785)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. 2uasbanh 38777 is 2uasbanhVD 39147 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from 2uasbanhVD 39147.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-May-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| h1:: | ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 100:1: | ⊢ (𝜒 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 2:100: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣
) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)
)
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑
↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)) )
| | 7:3,6: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 8:2: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 9:5: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓
↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓 )
| | 101:: | ⊢ ([𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑣 /
𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
| | 102:101: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
↔ [𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
| | 103:: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦
]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
| | 104:102,103: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
↔ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
| | 11:7,10,104: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧
𝜓) )
| | 110:5: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑
∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 12:11,110: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 120:12: | ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣
) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 13:1,120: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)) →
∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 14:: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 16:14: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 18:15,17: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 20:19: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑
∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 21:20: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 22:16: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 23:15,22: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
| | 25:24: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑
∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
| | 26:25: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
| | 27:21,26: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧
∃𝑥∃𝑦(
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
| | qed:13,27: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧
∃𝑥∃𝑦(
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
|
|
| ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | e2ebindVD 39148 |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 38785)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the
Metamath Proof Assistant. e2ebind 38779 is e2ebindVD 39148 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from e2ebindVD 39148.
| 1:: | ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
| | 2:1: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
| | 3:2: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑
))
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥
𝜑) )
| | 6:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥)
| | 7:5,6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 ↔
∃𝑥𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔
∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑) )
| | 9:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔
∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | 11:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑦𝜑)
| | 12:11: | ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑)
| | 13:10,12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔
∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃
𝑦𝜑))
| | 15:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | qed:14,15: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃
𝑦𝜑))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 27-Nov-2014.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑)) |
| |
| 20.31.8 Virtual Deduction transcriptions of
textbook proofs
|
| |
| Theorem | sb5ALTVD 39149* |
The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus
transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Unit 20
Excercise 3.a., which is sb5 2430, found in the "Answers to Starred
Exercises" on page 457 of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth
Edition (2008), by Virginia Klenk. The same proof may also be
interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It
was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd,
which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof
Assistant. sb5ALT 38731 is sb5ALTVD 39149 without virtual deductions and
was automatically derived from sb5ALTVD 39149.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ▶ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ▶ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦
∧ 𝜑) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)
)
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 =
𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) , (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) , (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 9:7: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) , (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) , (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) ▶ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 101:: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
| | 11:101,10: | ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
)
| | 12:5,11: | ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
)) ∧ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
| | qed:12: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)
)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | vk15.4jVD 39150 |
The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus
transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Unit 15
Excercise 4.f. found in the "Answers to Starred Exercises" on page 442
of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth Edition (2008), by Virginia
Klenk. The same proof may also be interpreted to be a Virtual Deduction
Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the
tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2
and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. vk15.4j 38734 is vk15.4jVD 39150
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from vk15.4jVD 39150. Step numbers greater than 25 are additional steps
necessary for the sequent calculus proof not contained in the
Fitch-style proof. Otherwise, step i of the User's Proof corresponds to
step i of the Fitch-style proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ ¬ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧
¬ 𝜒))
| | h2:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏
))
| | h3:: | ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑)
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ∃𝑥¬
𝜃 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∀𝑥𝜃 )
| | 6:3: | ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ 𝜏 )
| | 9:7: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 10:5: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ 𝜃 )
| | 11:10,8: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) )
| | 14:2,13: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒 )
| | 140:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜃
)
| | 141:140: | ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥¬ ∃𝑥
¬ 𝜃)
| | 142:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ∀𝑥∀𝑥𝜒)
| | 143:142: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜒 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝜒
)
| | 144:6,14,141,143: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒
)
| | 15:1: | ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓
∧ ¬ 𝜒))
| | 16:9: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 )
| | 161:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜑
)
| | 162:6,16,141,161: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑
)
| | 17:162: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥
¬ 𝜑 )
| | 18:15,17: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ∃𝑥(
𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ 𝜒) )
| | 20:144: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜒
)
| | 21:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , ¬ 𝜒 ▶ ¬
𝜒 )
| | 22:19: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜒
) )
| | 23:21,22: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , ¬ 𝜒 ▶ ¬
𝜓 )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , ¬ 𝜒 ▶ ∃
𝑥¬ 𝜓 )
| | 240:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜓
)
| | 241:20,24,141,240: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜓
)
| | 25:241: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓
)
| | qed:25: | ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ¬
(∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) & ⊢ ¬
∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | notnotrALTVD 39151 |
The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus
transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 5 of
Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 59 (which is notnotr 125). The same proof
may also be interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style
axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. notnotrALT 38735 is notnotrALTVD 39151
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from notnotrALTVD 39151. Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to
step i of the Fitch-style proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ¬ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑))
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 →
𝜑))
| | 5:3: | ⊢ ( ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) )
| | 6:5,1: | ⊢ ( ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ 𝜑 )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (¬ ¬
𝜑 → 𝜑) |
| |
| Theorem | con3ALTVD 39152 |
The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus
transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 7 of
Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 60 ( which is con3 149). The same proof
may also be interpreted to be a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style
axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. con3ALT2 38736 is con3ALTVD 39152
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from con3ALTVD 39152. Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to
step i of the Fitch-style proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) , ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ¬ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) , ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 5:1,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) , ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 6:: | ⊢ (𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
| | 7:6,5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) , ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ¬ ¬ 𝜓 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) ▶ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓
) )
| | 9:: | ⊢ ((¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 →
¬ 𝜑))
| | 10:8: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑) )
| | qed:10: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑)) |
| |
| 20.31.9 Theorems proved using conjunction-form
Virtual Deduction
|
| |
| Theorem | elpwgdedVD 39153 |
Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. Derived
from elpwg 4166. In form of VD deduction with 𝜑 and 𝜓 as
variable virtual hypothesis collections based on Mario Carneiro's
metavariable concept. elpwgded 38780 is elpwgdedVD 39153 using conventional
notation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ V ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ) ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimp 39154 |
If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a
subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication
of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 18. sspwimp 39154, using conventional
notation, was translated from virtual deduction form, sspwimpVD 39155,
using a translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpVD 39155 |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 38785)
using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed
manually, but has the potential to be completed automatically by a tools
program which would invoke Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's
Metamath Proof Assistant.
sspwimp 39154 is sspwimpVD 39155 without virtual deductions and was derived
from sspwimpVD 39155. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( .............. 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( .............. 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
▶ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 )
| | 4:3,1: | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 5:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵
)
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
)
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈
𝒫 𝐵) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
|
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpcf 39156 |
If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a
subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication
of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 18. sspwimpcf 39156, using
conventional notation, was translated from its virtual deduction form,
sspwimpcfVD 39157, using a translation program. (Contributed
by Alan Sare,
13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpcfVD 39157 |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 38785)
using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed
automatically by a tools program which would invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2
and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sspwimpcf 39156 is sspwimpcfVD 39157 without virtual deductions and was derived
from sspwimpcfVD 39157.
The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating
conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
▶ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 )
| | 4:3,1: | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 5:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵
)
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
)
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈
𝒫 𝐵) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
|
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALTcf 39158 |
The sucessor of a transitive class is transitive. suctrALTcf 39158, using
conventional notation, was translated from virtual deduction form,
suctrALTcfVD 39159, using a translation program. (Contributed
by Alan
Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALTcfVD 39159 |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 38785)
using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. The
conjunction-form version of completeusersproof.cmd. It allows the User
to avoid superflous virtual hypotheses. This proof was completed
automatically by a tools program which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's
mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. suctrALTcf 39158
is suctrALTcfVD 39159 without virtual deductions and was derived
automatically from suctrALTcfVD 39159. The version of
completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating
conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( Tr 𝐴 ▶ Tr 𝐴 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( ...................................
....... 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 5:1,3,4: | ⊢ ( ( Tr 𝐴 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 6:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
| | 7:5,6: | ⊢ ( ( Tr 𝐴 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ( Tr 𝐴 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 9:: | ⊢ ( ...................................
...... 𝑦 = 𝐴 ▶ 𝑦 = 𝐴 )
| | 10:3,9: | ⊢ ( ........ ( (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 11:10,6: | ⊢ ( ........ ( (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 13:2: | ⊢ ( .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴 )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴) )
| | 15:8,12,14: | ⊢ ( ( Tr 𝐴 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( Tr 𝐴 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( Tr 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( Tr 𝐴 ▶ Tr suc 𝐴 )
| | qed:18: | ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)
|
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| 20.31.10 Theorems with a VD proof in
conventional notation derived from a VD proof
|
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT3 39160 |
The successor of a transitive class is transitive. suctrALT3 39160 is the
completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof
http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctralt3vd.html.
It
was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from the
VD proof exists. See wvd1 38785 for a description of Virtual Deduction.
Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification
deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 19 used
jaoded 38782). Unification deductions employ Mario
Carneiro's metavariable
concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem
(e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 24 used dftr2 4754) .
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpALT 39161 |
If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a
subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication
of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 18. sspwimpALT 39161 is the completed
proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof
http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sspwimpaltvd.html.
It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from
the VD proof exists. See wvd1 38785 for a description of Virtual
Deduction.
Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification
deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 9 used
elpwgded 38780). Unification deductions employ Mario
Carneiro's
metavariable concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a
unification theorem (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 5
used elpwi 4168). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | unisnALT 39162 |
A set equals the union of its singleton. Theorem 8.2 of [Quine] p. 53.
The User manually input on a mmj2 Proof Worksheet, without labels, all
steps of unisnALT 39162 except 1, 11, 15, 21, and 30. With
execution of the
mmj2 unification command, mmj2 could find labels for all steps except
for 2, 12, 16, 22, and 31 (and the then non-existing steps 1, 11, 15,
21, and 30) . mmj2 could not find reference theorems for those five
steps because the hypothesis field of each of these steps was empty and
none of those steps unifies with a theorem in set.mm. Each of these
five steps is a semantic variation of a theorem in set.mm and is 2-step
provable. mmj2 does not have the ability to automatically generate the
semantic variation in set.mm of a theorem in a mmj2 Proof Worksheet
unless the theorem in the Proof Worksheet is labeled with a 1-hypothesis
deduction whose hypothesis is a theorem in set.mm which unifies with the
theorem in the Proof Worksheet. The stepprover.c program, which invokes
mmj2, has this capability. stepprover.c automatically generated steps 1,
11, 15, 21, and 30, labeled all steps, and generated the RPN proof of
unisnALT 39162. Roughly speaking, stepprover.c added to
the Proof
Worksheet a labeled duplicate step of each non-unifying theorem for each
label in a text file, labels.txt, containing a list of labels provided
by the User. Upon mmj2 unification, stepprover.c identified a label for
each of the five theorems which 2-step proves it. For unisnALT 39162, the
label list is a list of all 1-hypothesis propositional calculus
deductions in set.mm. stepproverp.c is the same as stepprover.c except
that it intermittently pauses during execution, allowing the User to
observe the changes to a text file caused by the execution of particular
statements of the program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 19-Aug-2016.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ∪
{𝐴} = 𝐴 |
| |
| 20.31.11 Theorems with a proof in conventional
notation derived from a VD proof
Theorems with a proof in conventional notation automatically derived by
completeusersproof.c from a Virtual Deduction User's Proof.
|
| |
| Theorem | notnotrALT2 39163 |
Converse of double negation. Theorem *2.14 of [WhiteheadRussell]
p. 102. Proof derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in
VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (¬ ¬
𝜑 → 𝜑) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpALT2 39164 |
If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a
subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication
of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 18. Proof derived by
completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt.
The User's Proof in html format is displayed in
http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sspwimpaltvd.html.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | e2ebindALT 39165 |
Absorption of an existential quantifier of a double existential
quantifier of non-distinct variables. The proof is derived by
completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt.
The User's Proof in html format is displayed in e2ebindVD 39148.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | ax6e2ndALT 39166* |
If at least two sets exist (dtru 4857) , then the same is true expressed
in an alternate form similar to the form of ax6e 2250.
The proof is
derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in
VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html format is
displayed in ax6e2ndVD 39144. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (¬
∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) |
| |
| Theorem | ax6e2ndeqALT 39167* |
"At least two sets exist" expressed in the form of dtru 4857
is logically
equivalent to the same expressed in a form similar to ax6e 2250
if dtru 4857
is false implies 𝑢 = 𝑣. Proof derived by
completeusersproof.c from
User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html
format is displayed in ax6e2ndeqVD 39145. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((¬
∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) |
| |
| Theorem | 2sb5ndALT 39168* |
Equivalence for double substitution 2sb5 2443 without distinct 𝑥,
𝑦 requirement. 2sb5nd 38776 is derived from 2sb5ndVD 39146. The proof is
derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in
VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html format is
displayed in 2sb5ndVD 39146. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 19-Sep-2016.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((¬
∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | chordthmALT 39169* |
The intersecting chords theorem. If points A, B, C, and D lie on a
circle (with center Q, say), and the point P is on the interior of the
segments AB and CD, then the two products of lengths PA · PB and
PC · PD are equal. The Euclidean plane is identified with the
complex plane, and the fact that P is on AB and on CD is expressed by
the hypothesis that the angles APB and CPD are equal to π. The
result is proven by using chordthmlem5 24563 twice to show that PA
· PB and PC · PD both equal BQ
2
−
PQ
2
. This is similar to the proof of the
theorem given in Euclid's Elements, where it is Proposition
III.35.
Proven by David Moews on 28-Feb-2017 as chordthm 24564.
http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/chordthmaltvd.html
is
a Virtual
Deduction User's Proof transcription of chordthm 24564. That VD User's
Proof was input into completeusersproof, automatically generating this
chordthmALT 39169 Metamath proof. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
19-Sep-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})
↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑃)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝑃)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝑃)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝑃)𝐹(𝐵 − 𝑃)) = π) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 − 𝑃)𝐹(𝐷 − 𝑃)) = π) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝑄))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) = (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝑄))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) = (abs‘(𝐷 − 𝑄))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘(𝑃 − 𝐴)) · (abs‘(𝑃 − 𝐵))) = ((abs‘(𝑃 − 𝐶)) · (abs‘(𝑃 − 𝐷)))) |
| |
| Theorem | isosctrlem1ALT 39170 |
Lemma for isosctr 24551. This proof was automatically derived by
completeusersproof from its Virtual Deduction proof counterpart
http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/isosctrlem1altvd.html.
As it is verified by the Metamath program, isosctrlem1ALT 39170 verifies
http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/isosctrlem1altvd.html.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Apr-2018.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧
(abs‘𝐴) = 1 ∧
¬ 1 = 𝐴) →
(ℑ‘(log‘(1 − 𝐴))) ≠ π) |
| |
| Theorem | iunconnlem2 39171* |
The indexed union of connected overlapping subspaces sharing a common
point is connected. This proof was automatically derived by
completeusersproof from its Virtual Deduction proof counterpart
http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconlem2vd.html.
As it is verified by the Metamath program, iunconnlem2 39171 verifies
http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconlem2vd.html.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Apr-2018.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (𝑢 ∩ ∪
𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑣 ∩ ∪
𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)) ∧ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (𝑢 ∪ 𝑣))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐽 ↾t 𝐵) ∈ Conn)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ↾t ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∈ Conn) |
| |
| Theorem | iunconnALT 39172* |
The indexed union of connected overlapping subspaces sharing a common
point is connected. This proof was automatically derived by
completeusersproof from its Virtual Deduction proof counterpart
http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconaltvd.html.
As
it is verified by the Metamath program, iunconnALT 39172 verifies
http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconaltvd.html.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Apr-2018.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐽 ↾t 𝐵) ∈ Conn)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ↾t ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∈ Conn) |
| |
| Theorem | sineq0ALT 39173 |
A complex number whose sine is zero is an integer multiple of π.
The Virtual Deduction form of the proof is
http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sineq0altvd.html.
The
Metamath form of the proof is sineq0ALT 39173. The Virtual Deduction proof
is based on Mario Carneiro's revision of Norm Megill's proof of sineq0 24273.
The Virtual Deduction proof is verified by automatically transforming it
into the Metamath form of the proof using completeusersproof, which is
verified by the Metamath program. The proof of
http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sineq0altro.html
is a
form of the completed proof which preserves the Virtual Deduction proof's
step numbers and their ordering. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2018.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ →
((sin‘𝐴) = 0 ↔
(𝐴 / π) ∈
ℤ)) |
| |
| 20.32 Mathbox for Glauco
Siliprandi
|
| |
| 20.32.1 Miscellanea
|
| |
| Theorem | evth2f 39174* |
A version of evth2 22759 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of
distinct
variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢
Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑋
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑋
& ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽 & ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran
(,))
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Comp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ ∅)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑦)) |
| |
| Theorem | elunif 39175* |
A version of eluni 4439 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of
distinct
variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢
Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | rzalf 39176 |
A version of rzal 4073 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of
distinct
variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = ∅ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
| |
| Theorem | fvelrnbf 39177 |
A version of fvelrnb 6243 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of
distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢
Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | rfcnpre1 39178 |
If F is a continuous function with respect to the standard topology,
then the preimage A of the values greater than a given extended real B
is an open set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢
Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
& ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran (,)) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪
𝐽 & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ 𝐵 < (𝐹‘𝑥)}
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐽) |
| |
| Theorem | ubelsupr 39179* |
If U belongs to A and U is an upper bound, then U is the sup of A.
(Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑈) → 𝑈 = sup(𝐴, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | fsumcnf 39180* |
A finite sum of functions to complex numbers from a common topological
space is continuous, without disjoint var constraint x ph. The class
expression for B normally contains free variables k and x to index it.
(Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐾 =
(TopOpen‘ℂfld) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) |
| |
| Theorem | mulltgt0 39181 |
The product of a negative and a positive number is negative. (Contributed
by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 0) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 <
𝐵)) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) < 0) |
| |
| Theorem | rspcegf 39182 |
A version of rspcev 3309 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of
distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) |
| |
| Theorem | rabexgf 39183 |
A version of rabexg 4812 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of
distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢
Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | fcnre 39184 |
A function continuous with respect to the standard topology, is a real
mapping. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran
(,))
& ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝐽 & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑇⟶ℝ) |
| |
| Theorem | sumsnd 39185* |
A sum of a singleton is the term. The deduction version of sumsn 14475.
(Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑘𝐵)
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 = 𝑀) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ {𝑀}𝐴 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | evthf 39186* |
A version of evth 22758 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of
distinct
variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢
Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑋
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑋
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
& ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽 & ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran
(,))
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Comp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ ∅)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | cnfex 39187 |
The class of continuous functions between two topologies is a set.
(Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐾 ∈ Top) → (𝐽 Cn 𝐾) ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | fnchoice 39188* |
For a finite set, a choice function exists, without using the axiom of
choice. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | refsumcn 39189* |
A finite sum of continuous real functions, from a common topological
space, is continuous. The class expression for B normally contains free
variables k and x to index it. See fsumcn 22673 for the analogous theorem
on continuous complex functions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
& ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran (,)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) |
| |
| Theorem | rfcnpre2 39190 |
If 𝐹 is a continuous function with
respect to the standard topology,
then the preimage A of the values smaller than a given extended real
𝐵, is an open set. (Contributed by
Glauco Siliprandi,
20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢
Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
& ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran (,)) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪
𝐽 & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) < 𝐵}
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐽) |
| |
| Theorem | cncmpmax 39191* |
When the hypothesis for the extreme value theorem hold, then the sup of
the range of the function belongs to the range, it is real and it an
upper bound of the range. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪
𝐽 & ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran
(,))
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Comp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ≠ ∅)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(ran 𝐹, ℝ, < ) ∈ ran 𝐹 ∧ sup(ran 𝐹, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℝ ∧ ∀𝑡
∈ 𝑇 (𝐹‘𝑡) ≤ sup(ran 𝐹, ℝ, < ))) |
| |
| Theorem | rfcnpre3 39192* |
If F is a continuous function with respect to the standard topology,
then the preimage A of the values greater or equal than a given real B
is a closed set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢
Ⅎ𝑡𝐹
& ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran (,)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪
𝐽 & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ∣ 𝐵 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑡)}
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽)) |
| |
| Theorem | rfcnpre4 39193* |
If F is a continuous function with respect to the standard topology,
then the preimage A of the values smaller or equal than a given real B
is a closed set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢
Ⅎ𝑡𝐹
& ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran (,)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪
𝐽 & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑡) ≤ 𝐵}
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽)) |
| |
| Theorem | sumpair 39194* |
Sum of two distinct complex values. The class expression for 𝐴 and
𝐵 normally contain free variable 𝑘 to
index it. (Contributed by
Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑘𝐷)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑘𝐸)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 = 𝐴) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝐶 = (𝐷 + 𝐸)) |
| |
| Theorem | rfcnnnub 39195* |
Given a real continuous function 𝐹 defined on a compact topological
space, there is always a positive integer that is a strict upper bound
of its range. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢
Ⅎ𝑡𝐹
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑡𝜑
& ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran (,)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Comp) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪
𝐽 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 (𝐹‘𝑡) < 𝑛) |
| |
| Theorem | refsum2cnlem1 39196* |
This is the core Lemma for refsum2cn 39197: the sum of two continuous real
functions (from a common topological space) is continuous. (Contributed
by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢
Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐺
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
& ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑘 ∈ {1, 2} ↦ if(𝑘 = 1, 𝐹, 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran
(,))
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐺‘𝑥))) ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) |
| |
| Theorem | refsum2cn 39197* |
The sum of two continuus real functions (from a common topological
space) is continuous. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
20-Apr-2017.)
|
| ⊢
Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐺
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
& ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran (,)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥) + (𝐺‘𝑥))) ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) |
| |
| Theorem | elunnel2 39198 |
A member of a union that is not a member of the second class, is a member
of the first class. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | adantlllr 39199 |
Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by Glauco
Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|
| ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
| |
| Theorem | 3adantlr3 39200 |
Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by Glauco
Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
Home
Hilbert Space Explorer
Users' Mathboxes