Theorem ralnralall 4080

Description: A contradiction concerning restricted generalization for a nonempty set implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Sep-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ralnralall	⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ralnralall

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r19.26 3064	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑))
2		pm3.24 926	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
3	2	bifal 1497	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ⊥)
4	3	ralbii 2980	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⊥)
5		r19.3rzv 4064	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (⊥ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⊥))
6		falim 1498	. . . 4 ⊢ (⊥ → 𝜓)
7	5, 6	syl6bir 244	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⊥ → 𝜓))
8	4, 7	syl5bi 232	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
9	1, 8	syl5bir 233	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384  ⊥wfal 1488   ≠ wne 2794  ∀wral 2912  ∅c0 3915

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-fal 1489  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-nul 3916

This theorem is referenced by: (None)