Theorem sbcrexgOLD 37349

Description: Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) Obsolete as of 18-Aug-2018. Use sbcrex 3514 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcrexgOLD	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑦)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sbcrexgOLD

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 3438	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
2		dfsbcq2 3438	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
3	2	rexbidv 3052	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
4		nfcv 2764	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
5		nfs1v 2437	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
6	4, 5	nfrex 3007	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
7		sbequ12 2111	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
8	7	rexbidv 3052	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
9	6, 8	sbie 2408	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
10	1, 3, 9	vtoclbg 3267	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   = wceq 1483  [wsb 1880   ∈ wcel 1990  ∃wrex 2913  [wsbc 3435

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436

This theorem is referenced by:  2sbcrexOLD  37350  sbc2rexgOLD  37352