Theorem xpiindi 5257

Description: Distributive law for Cartesian product over indexed intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpiindi	⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐶

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem xpiindi

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relxp 5227	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)
2	1	rgenw 2924	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)
3		r19.2z 4060	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵))
4	2, 3	mpan2 707	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵))
5		reliin 5240	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵) → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
6	4, 5	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
7		relxp 5227	. . 3 ⊢ Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
8	6, 7	jctil 560	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
9		r19.28zv 4066	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
10	9	bicomd 213	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
11		vex 3203	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
12		eliin 4525	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → (𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
13	11, 12	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
14	13	anbi2i 730	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
15		opelxp 5146	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
16	15	ralbii 2980	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
17	10, 14, 16	3bitr4g 303	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
18		opelxp 5146	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵))
19		opex 4932	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ V
20		eliin 4525	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ V → (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
21	19, 20	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵))
22	17, 18, 21	3bitr4g 303	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
23	22	eqrelrdv2 5219	. 2 ⊢ (((Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
24	8, 23	mpancom 703	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990   ≠ wne 2794  ∀wral 2912  ∃wrex 2913  Vcvv 3200  ∅c0 3915  ⟨cop 4183  ∩ ciin 4521   × cxp 5112  Rel wrel 5119

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-iin 4523  df-opab 4713  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121

This theorem is referenced by:  xpriindi  5258