Theorem bds 10642

Description: Boundedness of a formula resulting from implicit substitution in a bounded formula. Note that the proof does not use ax-bdsb 10613; therefore, using implicit instead of explicit substitution when boundedness is important, one might avoid using ax-bdsb 10613. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bds.bd	|- BOUNDED ph
bds.1	|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bds	|- BOUNDED ps

Distinct variable groups:   ps, x   ph, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( y)

Proof of Theorem bds

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bds.bd	. . . 4 |- BOUNDED ph
2	1	bdcab 10640	. . 3 |- BOUNDED { x | ph }
3		bds.1	. . . 4 |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
4	3	cbvabv 2202	. . 3 |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
5	2, 4	bdceqi 10634	. 2 |- BOUNDED { y | ps }
6	5	bdph 10641	1 |- BOUNDED ps

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 103   {cab 2067  BOUNDED wbd 10603

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-bd0 10604  ax-bdsb 10613

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-bdc 10632

This theorem is referenced by: (None)