Theorem ceqsalt 2625

Description: Closed theorem version of ceqsalg 2627. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsalt	|- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. V ) -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, A

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( x)   V( x)

Proof of Theorem ceqsalt

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elisset 2613	. . . 4 |- ( A e. V -> E. x x = A )
2	1	3ad2ant3 961	. . 3 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. V ) -> E. x x = A )
3		bi1 116	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ph <-> ps ) -> ( ph -> ps ) )
4	3	imim3i 60	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( ( x = A -> ph ) -> ( x = A -> ps ) ) )
5	4	al2imi 1387	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) -> A. x ( x = A -> ps ) ) )
6	5	3ad2ant2 960	. . . 4 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. V ) -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) -> A. x ( x = A -> ps ) ) )
7		19.23t 1607	. . . . 5 |- ( F/ x ps -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ps ) <-> ( E. x x = A -> ps ) ) )
8	7	3ad2ant1 959	. . . 4 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. V ) -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ps ) <-> ( E. x x = A -> ps ) ) )
9	6, 8	sylibd 147	. . 3 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. V ) -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) -> ( E. x x = A -> ps ) ) )
10	2, 9	mpid 41	. 2 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. V ) -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) -> ps ) )
11		bi2 128	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ph <-> ps ) -> ( ps -> ph ) )
12	11	imim2i 12	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( x = A -> ( ps -> ph ) ) )
13	12	com23 77	. . . . 5 |- ( ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( ps -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
14	13	alimi 1384	. . . 4 |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> A. x ( ps -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
15	14	3ad2ant2 960	. . 3 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. V ) -> A. x ( ps -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
16		19.21t 1514	. . . 4 |- ( F/ x ps -> ( A. x ( ps -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) <-> ( ps -> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) ) )
17	16	3ad2ant1 959	. . 3 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. V ) -> ( A. x ( ps -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) <-> ( ps -> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) ) )
18	15, 17	mpbid 145	. 2 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. V ) -> ( ps -> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
19	10, 18	impbid 127	1 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. V ) -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 103   /\ w3a 919   A.wal 1282   = wceq 1284   F/wnf 1389   E.wex 1421   e. wcel 1433

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-5 1376  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-v 2603

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsralt  2626