P. 27 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2601-2700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
2.1.6  The universal class
Syntax	cvv 2601	Extend class notation to include the universal class symbol.
class _V
Theorem	vjust 2602	Soundness justification theorem for df-v 2603. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 27-Apr-2010.)
|- { x | x = x } = { y | y = y }
Definition	df-v 2603	Define the universal class. Definition 5.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. Also Definition 2.9 of [Quine] p. 19. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- _V = { x | x = x }
Theorem	vex 2604	All setvar variables are sets (see isset 2605). Theorem 6.8 of [Quine] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- x e. _V
Theorem	isset 2605*	Two ways to say " A is a set": A class A is a member of the universal class _V (see df-v 2603) if and only if the class A exists (i.e. there exists some set x equal to class A). Theorem 6.9 of [Quine] p. 43. Notational convention: We will use the notational device " A e. _V " to mean " A is a set" very frequently, for example in uniex 4192. Note the when A is not a set, it is called a proper class. In some theorems, such as uniexg 4193, in order to shorten certain proofs we use the more general antecedent A e. V instead of A e. _V to mean " A is a set." Note that a constant is implicitly considered distinct from all variables. This is why _V is not included in the distinct variable list, even though df-clel 2077 requires that the expression substituted for B not contain x. (Also, the Metamath spec does not allow constants in the distinct variable list.) (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
|- ( A e. _V <-> E. x x = A )
Theorem	issetf 2606	A version of isset that does not require x and A to be distinct. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( A e. _V <-> E. x x = A )
Theorem	isseti 2607*	A way to say " A is a set" (inference rule). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- E. x x = A
Theorem	issetri 2608*	A way to say " A is a set" (inference rule). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- E. x x = A   =>    |- A e. _V
Theorem	eqvisset 2609	A class equal to a variable is a set. Note the absence of dv condition, contrary to isset 2605 and issetri 2608. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
|- ( x = A -> A e. _V )
Theorem	elex 2610	If a class is a member of another class, it is a set. Theorem 6.12 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. B -> A e. _V )
Theorem	elexi 2611	If a class is a member of another class, it is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. B   =>    |- A e. _V
Theorem	elexd 2612	If a class is a member of another class, it is a set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. _V )
Theorem	elisset 2613*	An element of a class exists. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-1995.)
|- ( A e. V -> E. x x = A )
Theorem	elex22 2614*	If two classes each contain another class, then both contain some set. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ A e. C ) -> E. x ( x e. B /\ x e. C ) )
Theorem	elex2 2615*	If a class contains another class, then it contains some set. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Sep-2011.)
|- ( A e. B -> E. x x e. B )
Theorem	ralv 2616	A universal quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
|- ( A. x e. _V ph <-> A. x ph )
Theorem	rexv 2617	An existential quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. _V ph <-> E. x ph )
Theorem	reuv 2618	A uniqueness quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.)
|- ( E! x e. _V ph <-> E! x ph )
Theorem	rmov 2619	A uniqueness quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E* x e. _V ph <-> E* x ph )
Theorem	rabab 2620	A class abstraction restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- { x e. _V | ph } = { x | ph }
Theorem	ralcom4 2621*	Commutation of restricted and unrestricted universal quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y ph <-> A. y A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexcom4 2622*	Commutation of restricted and unrestricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y ph <-> E. y E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexcom4a 2623*	Specialized existential commutation lemma. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.)
|- ( E. x E. y e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> E. y e. A ( ph /\ E. x ps ) )
Theorem	rexcom4b 2624*	Specialized existential commutation lemma. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( E. x E. y e. A ( ph /\ x = B ) <-> E. y e. A ph )
Theorem	ceqsalt 2625*	Closed theorem version of ceqsalg 2627. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. V ) -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsralt 2626*	Restricted quantifier version of ceqsalt 2625. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A. x e. B ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsalg 2627*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsal 2628*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps )
Theorem	ceqsalv 2629*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps )
Theorem	ceqsralv 2630*	Restricted quantifier version of ceqsalv 2629. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2013.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ( A. x e. B ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	gencl 2631*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
|- ( th <-> E. x ( ch /\ A = B ) )   &    |- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ch -> ph )   =>    |- ( th -> ps )
Theorem	2gencl 2632*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
|- ( C e. S <-> E. x e. R A = C )   &    |- ( D e. S <-> E. y e. R B = D )   &    |- ( A = C -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( B = D -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. R /\ y e. R ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) -> ch )
Theorem	3gencl 2633*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
|- ( D e. S <-> E. x e. R A = D )   &    |- ( F e. S <-> E. y e. R B = F )   &    |- ( G e. S <-> E. z e. R C = G )   &    |- ( A = D -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( B = F -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( C = G -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. R /\ y e. R /\ z e. R ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( D e. S /\ F e. S /\ G e. S ) -> th )
Theorem	cgsexg 2634*	Implicit substitution inference for general classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-2007.)
|- ( x = A -> ch )   &    |- ( ch -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( E. x ( ch /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	cgsex2g 2635*	Implicit substitution inference for general classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ch )   &    |- ( ch -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( E. x E. y ( ch /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	cgsex4g 2636*	An implicit substitution inference for 4 general classes. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) /\ ( z = C /\ w = D ) ) -> ch )   &    |- ( ch -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. R /\ D e. S ) ) -> ( E. x E. y E. z E. w ( ch /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsex 2637*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps )
Theorem	ceqsexv 2638*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps )
Theorem	ceqsex2 2639*	Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ch   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y ( x = A /\ y = B /\ ph ) <-> ch )
Theorem	ceqsex2v 2640*	Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y ( x = A /\ y = B /\ ph ) <-> ch )
Theorem	ceqsex3v 2641*	Elimination of three existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y E. z ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) /\ ph ) <-> th )
Theorem	ceqsex4v 2642*	Elimination of four existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( w = D -> ( th <-> ta ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y E. z E. w ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) /\ ( z = C /\ w = D ) /\ ph ) <-> ta )
Theorem	ceqsex6v 2643*	Elimination of six existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   &    |- E e. _V   &    |- F e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( w = D -> ( th <-> ta ) )   &    |- ( v = E -> ( ta <-> et ) )   &    |- ( u = F -> ( et <-> ze ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) /\ ( w = D /\ v = E /\ u = F ) /\ ph ) <-> ze )
Theorem	ceqsex8v 2644*	Elimination of eight existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   &    |- E e. _V   &    |- F e. _V   &    |- G e. _V   &    |- H e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( w = D -> ( th <-> ta ) )   &    |- ( v = E -> ( ta <-> et ) )   &    |- ( u = F -> ( et <-> ze ) )   &    |- ( t = G -> ( ze <-> si ) )   &    |- ( s = H -> ( si <-> rh ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y E. z E. w E. v E. u E. t E. s ( ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) /\ ( z = C /\ w = D ) ) /\ ( ( v = E /\ u = F ) /\ ( t = G /\ s = H ) ) /\ ph ) <-> rh )
Theorem	gencbvex 2645*	Change of bound variable using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( A = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( A = y -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( th <-> E. x ( ch /\ A = y ) )   =>    |- ( E. x ( ch /\ ph ) <-> E. y ( th /\ ps ) )
Theorem	gencbvex2 2646*	Restatement of gencbvex 2645 with weaker hypotheses. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 6-Dec-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( A = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( A = y -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( th -> E. x ( ch /\ A = y ) )   =>    |- ( E. x ( ch /\ ph ) <-> E. y ( th /\ ps ) )
Theorem	gencbval 2647*	Change of bound variable using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2018.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( A = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( A = y -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( th <-> E. x ( ch /\ A = y ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ( ch -> ph ) <-> A. y ( th -> ps ) )
Theorem	sbhypf 2648*	Introduce an explicit substitution into an implicit substitution hypothesis. See also csbhypf . (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Apr-2004.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( y = A -> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	vtoclgft 2649	Closed theorem form of vtoclgf 2657. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ( ( F/_ x A /\ F/ x ps ) /\ ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A. x ph ) /\ A e. V ) -> ps )
Theorem	vtocldf 2650	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ps )   &    |- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ch )   =>    |- ( ph -> ch )
Theorem	vtocld 2651*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> ch )
Theorem	vtoclf 2652*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. This is a generalization of chvar 1680. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ps
Theorem	vtocl 2653*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ps
Theorem	vtocl2 2654*	Implicit substitution of classes for setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ps
Theorem	vtocl3 2655*	Implicit substitution of classes for setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ps
Theorem	vtoclb 2656*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( ch <-> th )
Theorem	vtoclgf 2657	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable, with bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ps )
Theorem	vtoclg 2658*	Implicit substitution of a class expression for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-Apr-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ps )
Theorem	vtoclbg 2659*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( ch <-> th ) )
Theorem	vtocl2gf 2660	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1995.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ y B   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ch   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ch )
Theorem	vtocl3gf 2661	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ z A   &    |- F/_ y B   &    |- F/_ z B   &    |- F/_ z C   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ch   &    |- F/ z th   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> th )
Theorem	vtocl2g 2662*	Implicit substitution of 2 classes for 2 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ch )
Theorem	vtoclgaf 2663*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x e. B -> ph )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ps )
Theorem	vtoclga 2664*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x e. B -> ph )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ps )
Theorem	vtocl2gaf 2665*	Implicit substitution of 2 classes for 2 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2013.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ y B   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ch   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ch )
Theorem	vtocl2ga 2666*	Implicit substitution of 2 classes for 2 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ch )
Theorem	vtocl3gaf 2667*	Implicit substitution of 3 classes for 3 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ z A   &    |- F/_ y B   &    |- F/_ z B   &    |- F/_ z C   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ch   &    |- F/ z th   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. R /\ y e. S /\ z e. T ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S /\ C e. T ) -> th )
Theorem	vtocl3ga 2668*	Implicit substitution of 3 classes for 3 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. D /\ y e. R /\ z e. S ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. R /\ C e. S ) -> th )
Theorem	vtocleg 2669*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2004.)
|- ( x = A -> ph )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ph )
Theorem	vtoclegft 2670*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Closed theorem version of vtoclef 2671.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ F/ x ph /\ A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) -> ph )
Theorem	vtoclef 2671*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ph )   =>    |- ph
Theorem	vtocle 2672*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-1993.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ph )   =>    |- ph
Theorem	vtoclri 2673*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-1994.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- A. x e. B ph   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ps )
Theorem	spcimgft 2674	A closed version of spcimgf 2678. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) ) -> ( A e. B -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) ) )
Theorem	spcgft 2675	A closed version of spcgf 2680. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( A e. B -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) ) )
Theorem	spcimegft 2676	A closed version of spcimegf 2679. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ps -> ph ) ) -> ( A e. B -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) ) )
Theorem	spcegft 2677	A closed version of spcegf 2681. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jun-2018.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( A e. B -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) ) )
Theorem	spcimgf 2678	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 7.3 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spcimegf 2679	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) )
Theorem	spcgf 2680	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 7.3 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spcegf 2681	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) )
Theorem	spcimdv 2682*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	spcdv 2683*	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Analogous to rspcdv 2704. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	spcimedv 2684*	Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ch -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ch -> E. x ps ) )
Theorem	spcgv 2685*	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 7.3 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1994.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spcegv 2686*	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) )
Theorem	spc2egv 2687*	Existential specialization with 2 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( ps -> E. x E. y ph ) )
Theorem	spc2gv 2688*	Specialization with 2 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A. x A. y ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spc3egv 2689*	Existential specialization with 3 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( ps -> E. x E. y E. z ph ) )
Theorem	spc3gv 2690*	Specialization with 3 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( A. x A. y A. z ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spcv 2691*	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ph -> ps )
Theorem	spcev 2692*	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 22-Dec-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ps -> E. x ph )
Theorem	spc2ev 2693*	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ps -> E. x E. y ph )
Theorem	rspct 2694*	A closed version of rspc 2695. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.)
|- F/ x ps   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( A e. B -> ( A. x e. B ph -> ps ) ) )
Theorem	rspc 2695*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ( A. x e. B ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	rspce 2696*	Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. B /\ ps ) -> E. x e. B ph )
Theorem	rspcv 2697*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ( A. x e. B ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	rspccv 2698*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2006.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. B ph -> ( A e. B -> ps ) )
Theorem	rspcva 2699*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2005.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. B /\ A. x e. B ph ) -> ps )
Theorem	rspccva 2700*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A. x e. B ph /\ A e. B ) -> ps )