Theorem ceqsralt 2626

Description: Restricted quantifier version of ceqsalt 2625. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsralt	|- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A. x e. B ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( x)

Proof of Theorem ceqsralt

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ral 2353	. . . 4 |- ( A. x e. B ( x = A -> ph ) <-> A. x ( x e. B -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
2		eleq1 2141	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( x = A -> ( x e. B <-> A e. B ) )
3	2	pm5.32ri 442	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( x e. B /\ x = A ) <-> ( A e. B /\ x = A ) )
4	3	imbi1i 236	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( x e. B /\ x = A ) -> ph ) <-> ( ( A e. B /\ x = A ) -> ph ) )
5		impexp 259	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( x e. B /\ x = A ) -> ph ) <-> ( x e. B -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
6		impexp 259	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( A e. B /\ x = A ) -> ph ) <-> ( A e. B -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
7	4, 5, 6	3bitr3i 208	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x e. B -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) <-> ( A e. B -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
8	7	albii 1399	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x ( x e. B -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) <-> A. x ( A e. B -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
9	8	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A. x ( x e. B -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) <-> A. x ( A e. B -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) ) )
10	1, 9	syl5bb 190	. . 3 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A. x e. B ( x = A -> ph ) <-> A. x ( A e. B -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) ) )
11		19.21v 1794	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( A e. B -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) <-> ( A e. B -> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
12	10, 11	syl6bb 194	. 2 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A. x e. B ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ( A e. B -> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) ) )
13		biimt 239	. . 3 |- ( A e. B -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ( A e. B -> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) ) )
14	13	3ad2ant3 961	. 2 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ( A e. B -> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) ) )
15		ceqsalt 2625	. 2 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )
16	12, 14, 15	3bitr2d 214	1 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A. x e. B ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   <-> wb 103   /\ w3a 919   A.wal 1282   = wceq 1284   F/wnf 1389   e. wcel 1433   A.wral 2348

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-5 1376  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-ral 2353  df-v 2603

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsralv  2630