Theorem ceqsrexbv 2726

Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Mar-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv.1	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexbv	|- ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B   ps, x

Allowed substitution hint:   ph( x)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexbv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r19.42v 2511	. 2 |- ( E. x e. B ( A e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) <-> ( A e. B /\ E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
2		eleq1 2141	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = A -> ( x e. B <-> A e. B ) )
3	2	adantr 270	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x = A /\ ph ) -> ( x e. B <-> A e. B ) )
4	3	pm5.32ri 442	. . . . 5 |- ( ( x e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
5	4	bicomi 130	. . . 4 |- ( ( A e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) <-> ( x e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
6	5	baib 861	. . 3 |- ( x e. B -> ( ( A e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) <-> ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
7	6	rexbiia 2381	. 2 |- ( E. x e. B ( A e. B /\ ( x = A /\ ph ) ) <-> E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) )
8		ceqsrexv.1	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
9	8	ceqsrexv 2725	. . 3 |- ( A e. B -> ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
10	9	pm5.32i 441	. 2 |- ( ( A e. B /\ E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) )
11	1, 7, 10	3bitr3i 208	1 |- ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   <-> wb 103   = wceq 1284   e. wcel 1433   E.wrex 2349

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-rex 2354  df-v 2603

This theorem is referenced by:  frecsuclem3  6013