Theorem nfsb2or 1758

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution. Similar to hbsb2 1757 but in intuitionistic logic a disjunction is stronger than an implication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Feb-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfsb2or	|- ( A. x x = y \/ F/ x [ y / x ] ph )

Proof of Theorem nfsb2or

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb4or 1754	. 2 |- ( A. x x = y \/ A. x ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
2		sb2 1690	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A. x ( x = y -> ph ) -> [ y / x ] ph )
3	2	a5i 1475	. . . . . 6 |- ( A. x ( x = y -> ph ) -> A. x [ y / x ] ph )
4	3	imim2i 12	. . . . 5 |- ( ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) -> ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x [ y / x ] ph ) )
5	4	alimi 1384	. . . 4 |- ( A. x ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) -> A. x ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x [ y / x ] ph ) )
6		df-nf 1390	. . . 4 |- ( F/ x [ y / x ] ph <-> A. x ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x [ y / x ] ph ) )
7	5, 6	sylibr 132	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) -> F/ x [ y / x ] ph )
8	7	orim2i 710	. 2 |- ( ( A. x x = y \/ A. x ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) -> ( A. x x = y \/ F/ x [ y / x ] ph ) )
9	1, 8	ax-mp 7	1 |- ( A. x x = y \/ F/ x [ y / x ] ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   \/ wo 661   A.wal 1282   F/wnf 1389   [wsb 1685

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686

This theorem is referenced by:  sbequi  1760