Theorem rabxmdc 3276

Description: Law of excluded middle given decidability, in terms of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabxmdc	|- ( A. xDECID ph -> A = ( { x e. A | ph } u. { x e. A | -. ph } ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, A

Allowed substitution hint:   ph( x)

Proof of Theorem rabxmdc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exmiddc 777	. . . . . 6 |- (DECID ph -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) )
2	1	a1d 22	. . . . 5 |- (DECID ph -> ( x e. A -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) ) )
3	2	alimi 1384	. . . 4 |- ( A. xDECID ph -> A. x ( x e. A -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) ) )
4		df-ral 2353	. . . 4 |- ( A. x e. A ( ph \/ -. ph ) <-> A. x ( x e. A -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) ) )
5	3, 4	sylibr 132	. . 3 |- ( A. xDECID ph -> A. x e. A ( ph \/ -. ph ) )
6		rabid2 2530	. . 3 |- ( A = { x e. A | ( ph \/ -. ph ) } <-> A. x e. A ( ph \/ -. ph ) )
7	5, 6	sylibr 132	. 2 |- ( A. xDECID ph -> A = { x e. A | ( ph \/ -. ph ) } )
8		unrab 3235	. 2 |- ( { x e. A | ph } u. { x e. A | -. ph } ) = { x e. A | ( ph \/ -. ph ) }
9	7, 8	syl6eqr 2131	1 |- ( A. xDECID ph -> A = ( { x e. A | ph } u. { x e. A | -. ph } ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   \/ wo 661  DECID wdc 775   A.wal 1282   = wceq 1284   e. wcel 1433   A.wral 2348   {crab 2352   u. cun 2971

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-dc 776  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rab 2357  df-v 2603  df-un 2977

This theorem is referenced by: (None)