Theorem rspcimdv 2702

Description: Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv.1	|- ( ph -> A e. B )
rspcimdv.2	|- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv	|- ( ph -> ( A. x e. B ps -> ch ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B   ph, x   ch, x

Allowed substitution hint:   ps( x)

Proof of Theorem rspcimdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ral 2353	. 2 |- ( A. x e. B ps <-> A. x ( x e. B -> ps ) )
2		rspcimdv.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A e. B )
3		simpr 108	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> x = A )
4	3	eleq1d 2147	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( x e. B <-> A e. B ) )
5	4	biimprd 156	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( A e. B -> x e. B ) )
6		rspcimdv.2	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )
7	5, 6	imim12d 73	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( x e. B -> ps ) -> ( A e. B -> ch ) ) )
8	2, 7	spcimdv 2682	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( A. x ( x e. B -> ps ) -> ( A e. B -> ch ) ) )
9	2, 8	mpid 41	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( A. x ( x e. B -> ps ) -> ch ) )
10	1, 9	syl5bi 150	1 |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. B ps -> ch ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   A.wal 1282   = wceq 1284   e. wcel 1433   A.wral 2348

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-v 2603

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcdv  2704