Theorem bdsep2 10677

Description: Version of ax-bdsep 10675 with one DV condition removed and without initial universal quantifier. Use bdsep1 10676 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bdsep2.1	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdsep2	⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑎,𝑏,𝑥   𝜑,𝑏

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑎)

Proof of Theorem bdsep2

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq2 2142	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎))
2	1	anbi1d 452	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	bibi2d 230	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))))
4	3	albidv 1745	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))))
5	4	exbidv 1746	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → (∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))))
6		bdsep2.1	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
7	6	bdsep1 10676	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
8	5, 7	chvarv 1853	1 ⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103  ∀wal 1282  ∃wex 1421  BOUNDED wbd 10603

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-5 1376  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-ext 2063  ax-bdsep 10675

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077

This theorem is referenced by:  bdsepnft  10678  bdsepnfALT  10680