Theorem bj-omex2 10772

Description: Using bounded set induction and the strong axiom of infinity, ω is a set, that is, we recover ax-infvn 10736 (see bj-2inf 10733 for the equivalence of the latter with bj-omex 10737). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-omex2	⊢ ω ∈ V

Proof of Theorem bj-omex2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑎 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-inf2 10771	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑎∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 𝑥 = suc 𝑦))
2		vex 2604	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
3		bdcv 10639	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑎
4	3	bj-inf2vn 10769	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ V → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝑎 = ω))
5	2, 4	ax-mp 7	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝑎 = ω)
6	1, 5	eximii 1533	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑎 𝑎 = ω
7	6	issetri 2608	1 ⊢ ω ∈ V

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 103   ∨ wo 661  ∀wal 1282   = wceq 1284   ∈ wcel 1433  ∃wrex 2349  Vcvv 2601  ∅c0 3251  suc csuc 4120  ωcom 4331

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 576  ax-in2 577  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-13 1444  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-nul 3904  ax-pr 3964  ax-un 4188  ax-bd0 10604  ax-bdim 10605  ax-bdor 10607  ax-bdex 10610  ax-bdeq 10611  ax-bdel 10612  ax-bdsb 10613  ax-bdsep 10675  ax-bdsetind 10763  ax-inf2 10771

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-rab 2357  df-v 2603  df-dif 2975  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-nul 3252  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-uni 3602  df-int 3637  df-suc 4126  df-iom 4332  df-bdc 10632  df-bj-ind 10722

This theorem is referenced by: (None)