Theorem bj-vtoclgft 10585

Description: Weakening two hypotheses of vtoclgf 2657. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-vtoclgf.nf1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
bj-vtoclgf.nf2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
bj-vtoclgf.min	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-vtoclgft	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem bj-vtoclgft

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 2610	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		bj-vtoclgf.nf1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	2	issetf 2606	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
4		bj-vtoclgf.nf2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5		bj-vtoclgf.min	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)
6	4, 5	bj-exlimmp 10580	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜓))
7	3, 6	syl5bi 150	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ V → 𝜓))
8	1, 7	syl5 32	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1282   = wceq 1284  Ⅎwnf 1389  ∃wex 1421   ∈ wcel 1433  Ⅎwnfc 2206  Vcvv 2601

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-v 2603

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-vtoclgf  10586  elabgft1  10588  bj-rspgt  10596