Theorem vtoclgf 2657

Description: Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable, with bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
vtoclgf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
vtoclgf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
vtoclgf.3	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
vtoclgf.4	⊢ 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
vtoclgf	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem vtoclgf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 2610	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		vtoclgf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	2	issetf 2606	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
4		vtoclgf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5		vtoclgf.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝜑
6		vtoclgf.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
7	5, 6	mpbii 146	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜓)
8	4, 7	exlimi 1525	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜓)
9	3, 8	sylbi 119	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → 𝜓)
10	1, 9	syl 14	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 103   = wceq 1284  Ⅎwnf 1389  ∃wex 1421   ∈ wcel 1433  Ⅎwnfc 2206  Vcvv 2601

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-v 2603

This theorem is referenced by:  vtoclg  2658  vtocl2gf  2660  vtocl3gf  2661  vtoclgaf  2663  ceqsexg  2723  elabgf  2736  mob  2774  opeliunxp2  4494  fvmptss2  5268