Theorem bj-zfpair2 10701

Description: Proof of zfpair2 3965 using only bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-zfpair2	⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V

Proof of Theorem bj-zfpair2

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-bdeq 10611	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑤 = 𝑥
2		ax-bdeq 10611	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑤 = 𝑦
3	1, 2	ax-bdor 10607	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)
4		ax-pr 3964	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
5	3, 4	bdbm1.3ii 10682	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
6		dfcleq 2075	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}))
7		vex 2604	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
8	7	elpr 3419	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
9	8	bibi2i 225	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
10	9	albii 1399	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
11	6, 10	bitri 182	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
12	11	exbii 1536	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
13	5, 12	mpbir 144	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦}
14	13	issetri 2608	1 ⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 103   ∨ wo 661  ∀wal 1282   = wceq 1284  ∃wex 1421   ∈ wcel 1433  Vcvv 2601  {cpr 3399

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-pr 3964  ax-bdor 10607  ax-bdeq 10611  ax-bdsep 10675

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-v 2603  df-un 2977  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-prexg  10702