Theorem ceqsex 2637

Description: Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsex.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
ceqsex.2	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
ceqsex.3	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsex	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ceqsex.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		ceqsex.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	biimpa 290	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)
4	1, 3	exlimi 1525	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)
5	2	biimprcd 158	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))
6	1, 5	alrimi 1455	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑))
7		ceqsex.2	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
8	7	isseti 2607	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴
9		exintr 1565	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
10	6, 8, 9	mpisyl 1375	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
11	4, 10	impbii 124	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103  ∀wal 1282   = wceq 1284  Ⅎwnf 1389  ∃wex 1421   ∈ wcel 1433  Vcvv 2601

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-5 1376  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-v 2603

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsexv  2638  ceqsex2  2639