Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabid2 | GIF version |
Description: An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabid2 | ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | abeq2 2187 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
2 | pm4.71 381 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
3 | 2 | albii 1399 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
4 | 1, 3 | bitr4i 185 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
5 | df-rab 2357 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
6 | 5 | eqeq2i 2091 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
7 | df-ral 2353 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | |
8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3bitr4i 210 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ↔ wb 103 ∀wal 1282 = wceq 1284 ∈ wcel 1433 {cab 2067 ∀wral 2348 {crab 2352 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-5 1376 ax-7 1377 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-8 1435 ax-11 1437 ax-4 1440 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 ax-i5r 1468 ax-ext 2063 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-clab 2068 df-cleq 2074 df-clel 2077 df-ral 2353 df-rab 2357 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabxmdc 3276 rabrsndc 3460 class2seteq 3937 dmmptg 4838 fneqeql 5296 fmpt 5340 acexmidlemph 5525 ioomax 8971 iccmax 8972 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |