Theorem rext 3970

Description: A theorem similar to extensionality, requiring the existence of a singleton. Exercise 8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1993.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rext	⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem rext

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vsnid 3426	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥}
2		vex 2604	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
3	2	snex 3957	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥} ∈ V
4		eleq2 2142	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥} → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥}))
5		eleq2 2142	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥} → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥}))
6	4, 5	imbi12d 232	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥} → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥} → 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥})))
7	3, 6	spcv 2691	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧) → (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥} → 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥}))
8	1, 7	mpi 15	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥})
9		velsn 3415	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥} ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑥)
10		equcomi 1632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
11	9, 10	sylbi 119	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥} → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
12	8, 11	syl 14	1 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1282   = wceq 1284   ∈ wcel 1433  {csn 3398

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-pow 3948

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-v 2603  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-pw 3384  df-sn 3404

This theorem is referenced by: (None)