Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rspc2ev | GIF version |
Description: 2-variable restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1999.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspc2v.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
rspc2v.2 | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspc2ev | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rspc2v.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
2 | 1 | rspcev 2701 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒) |
3 | 2 | anim2i 334 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒)) |
4 | 3 | 3impb 1134 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒)) |
5 | rspc2v.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
6 | 5 | rexbidv 2369 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒)) |
7 | 6 | rspcev 2701 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑) |
8 | 4, 7 | syl 14 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ↔ wb 103 ∧ w3a 919 = wceq 1284 ∈ wcel 1433 ∃wrex 2349 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-io 662 ax-5 1376 ax-7 1377 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-8 1435 ax-10 1436 ax-11 1437 ax-i12 1438 ax-bndl 1439 ax-4 1440 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 ax-i5r 1468 ax-ext 2063 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-3an 921 df-tru 1287 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-clab 2068 df-cleq 2074 df-clel 2077 df-nfc 2208 df-rex 2354 df-v 2603 |
This theorem is referenced by: rspc3ev 2717 opelxp 4392 rspceov 5567 2dom 6308 apreim 7703 addcn2 10149 mulcn2 10151 divalglemnn 10318 bezoutlema 10388 bezoutlemb 10389 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |