Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > 2dom | GIF version |
Description: A set that dominates ordinal 2 has at least 2 different members. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
2dom | ⊢ (2𝑜 ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df2o2 6038 | . . . 4 ⊢ 2𝑜 = {∅, {∅}} | |
2 | 1 | breq1i 3792 | . . 3 ⊢ (2𝑜 ≼ 𝐴 ↔ {∅, {∅}} ≼ 𝐴) |
3 | brdomi 6253 | . . 3 ⊢ ({∅, {∅}} ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴) | |
4 | 2, 3 | sylbi 119 | . 2 ⊢ (2𝑜 ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴) |
5 | f1f 5112 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → 𝑓:{∅, {∅}}⟶𝐴) | |
6 | 0ex 3905 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V | |
7 | 6 | prid1 3498 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅, {∅}} |
8 | ffvelrn 5321 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓:{∅, {∅}}⟶𝐴 ∧ ∅ ∈ {∅, {∅}}) → (𝑓‘∅) ∈ 𝐴) | |
9 | 5, 7, 8 | sylancl 404 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → (𝑓‘∅) ∈ 𝐴) |
10 | p0ex 3959 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ {∅} ∈ V | |
11 | 10 | prid2 3499 | . . . . 5 ⊢ {∅} ∈ {∅, {∅}} |
12 | ffvelrn 5321 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓:{∅, {∅}}⟶𝐴 ∧ {∅} ∈ {∅, {∅}}) → (𝑓‘{∅}) ∈ 𝐴) | |
13 | 5, 11, 12 | sylancl 404 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → (𝑓‘{∅}) ∈ 𝐴) |
14 | 0nep0 3939 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ≠ {∅} | |
15 | 14 | neii 2247 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ ∅ = {∅} |
16 | f1fveq 5432 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 ∧ (∅ ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∧ {∅} ∈ {∅, {∅}})) → ((𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅}) ↔ ∅ = {∅})) | |
17 | 7, 11, 16 | mpanr12 429 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → ((𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅}) ↔ ∅ = {∅})) |
18 | 15, 17 | mtbiri 632 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → ¬ (𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅})) |
19 | eqeq1 2087 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘∅) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦)) | |
20 | 19 | notbid 624 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘∅) → (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ (𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦)) |
21 | eqeq2 2090 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘{∅}) → ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅}))) | |
22 | 21 | notbid 624 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘{∅}) → (¬ (𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ (𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅}))) |
23 | 20, 22 | rspc2ev 2715 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑓‘∅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘{∅}) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅})) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
24 | 9, 13, 18, 23 | syl3anc 1169 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
25 | 24 | exlimiv 1529 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑓 𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
26 | 4, 25 | syl 14 | 1 ⊢ (2𝑜 ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 103 = wceq 1284 ∃wex 1421 ∈ wcel 1433 ∃wrex 2349 ∅c0 3251 {csn 3398 {cpr 3399 class class class wbr 3785 ⟶wf 4918 –1-1→wf1 4919 ‘cfv 4922 2𝑜c2o 6018 ≼ cdom 6243 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-in1 576 ax-in2 577 ax-io 662 ax-5 1376 ax-7 1377 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-8 1435 ax-10 1436 ax-11 1437 ax-i12 1438 ax-bndl 1439 ax-4 1440 ax-13 1444 ax-14 1445 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 ax-i5r 1468 ax-ext 2063 ax-sep 3896 ax-nul 3904 ax-pow 3948 ax-pr 3964 ax-un 4188 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-3an 921 df-tru 1287 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-eu 1944 df-mo 1945 df-clab 2068 df-cleq 2074 df-clel 2077 df-nfc 2208 df-ne 2246 df-ral 2353 df-rex 2354 df-v 2603 df-sbc 2816 df-dif 2975 df-un 2977 df-in 2979 df-ss 2986 df-nul 3252 df-pw 3384 df-sn 3404 df-pr 3405 df-op 3407 df-uni 3602 df-br 3786 df-opab 3840 df-id 4048 df-suc 4126 df-xp 4369 df-rel 4370 df-cnv 4371 df-co 4372 df-dm 4373 df-rn 4374 df-iota 4887 df-fun 4924 df-fn 4925 df-f 4926 df-f1 4927 df-fv 4930 df-1o 6024 df-2o 6025 df-dom 6246 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |