Theorem rspce 2696

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspc.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
rspc.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspce	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspce

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcv 2219	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		nfv 1461	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
3		rspc.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
4	2, 3	nfan 1497	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)
5		eleq1 2141	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
6		rspc.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
7	5, 6	anbi12d 456	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
8	1, 4, 7	spcegf 2681	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
9	8	anabsi5 543	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
10		df-rex 2354	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
11	9, 10	sylibr 132	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103   = wceq 1284  Ⅎwnf 1389  ∃wex 1421   ∈ wcel 1433  ∃wrex 2349

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-rex 2354  df-v 2603

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcev  2701  bezoutlemmain  10387