Theorem ssopab2 4030

Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssopab2	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem ssopab2

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfa1 1474	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓)
2		nfa1 1474	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓)
3		sp 1441	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
4	3	anim2d 330	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
5	2, 4	eximd 1543	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
6	5	sps 1470	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
7	1, 6	eximd 1543	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
8	7	ss2abdv 3067	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)})
9		df-opab 3840	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
10		df-opab 3840	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
11	8, 9, 10	3sstr4g 3040	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102  ∀wal 1282   = wceq 1284  ∃wex 1421  {cab 2067   ⊆ wss 2973  ⟨cop 3401  {copab 3838

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-opab 3840

This theorem is referenced by:  ssopab2b  4031  ssopab2i  4032  ssopab2dv  4033