Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for David A. Wheeler < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  alimp-no-surprise Structured version   Visualization version   Unicode version

Theorem alimp-no-surprise 42527
Description: There is no "surprise" in a for-all with implication if there exists a value where the antecedent is true. This is one way to prevent for-all with implication from allowing anything. For a contrast, see alimp-surprise 42526. The allsome quantifier also counters this problem, see df-alsi 42534. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 27-Oct-2018.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
alimp-no-surprise  |-  -.  ( A. x ( ph  ->  ps )  /\  A. x
( ph  ->  -.  ps )  /\  E. x ph )

Proof of Theorem alimp-no-surprise
StepHypRef Expression
1 pm4.82 969 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( ( ph  ->  ps )  /\  ( ph  ->  -. 
ps ) )  <->  -.  ph )
21albii 1747 . . . 4  |-  ( A. x ( ( ph  ->  ps )  /\  ( ph  ->  -.  ps )
)  <->  A. x  -.  ph )
3 alnex 1706 . . . 4  |-  ( A. x  -.  ph  <->  -.  E. x ph )
42, 3sylbb 209 . . 3  |-  ( A. x ( ( ph  ->  ps )  /\  ( ph  ->  -.  ps )
)  ->  -.  E. x ph )
5 imnan 438 . . 3  |-  ( ( A. x ( (
ph  ->  ps )  /\  ( ph  ->  -.  ps )
)  ->  -.  E. x ph )  <->  -.  ( A. x ( ( ph  ->  ps )  /\  ( ph  ->  -.  ps )
)  /\  E. x ph ) )
64, 5mpbi 220 . 2  |-  -.  ( A. x ( ( ph  ->  ps )  /\  ( ph  ->  -.  ps )
)  /\  E. x ph )
7 19.26 1798 . . . 4  |-  ( A. x ( ( ph  ->  ps )  /\  ( ph  ->  -.  ps )
)  <->  ( A. x
( ph  ->  ps )  /\  A. x ( ph  ->  -.  ps ) ) )
87anbi2ci 732 . . 3  |-  ( ( A. x ( (
ph  ->  ps )  /\  ( ph  ->  -.  ps )
)  /\  E. x ph )  <->  ( E. x ph  /\  ( A. x
( ph  ->  ps )  /\  A. x ( ph  ->  -.  ps ) ) ) )
9 3anass 1042 . . 3  |-  ( ( E. x ph  /\  A. x ( ph  ->  ps )  /\  A. x
( ph  ->  -.  ps ) )  <->  ( E. x ph  /\  ( A. x ( ph  ->  ps )  /\  A. x
( ph  ->  -.  ps ) ) ) )
10 3anrot 1043 . . 3  |-  ( ( E. x ph  /\  A. x ( ph  ->  ps )  /\  A. x
( ph  ->  -.  ps ) )  <->  ( A. x ( ph  ->  ps )  /\  A. x
( ph  ->  -.  ps )  /\  E. x ph ) )
118, 9, 103bitr2i 288 . 2  |-  ( ( A. x ( (
ph  ->  ps )  /\  ( ph  ->  -.  ps )
)  /\  E. x ph )  <->  ( A. x
( ph  ->  ps )  /\  A. x ( ph  ->  -.  ps )  /\  E. x ph ) )
126, 11mtbi 312 1  |-  -.  ( A. x ( ph  ->  ps )  /\  A. x
( ph  ->  -.  ps )  /\  E. x ph )
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:   -. wn 3    -> wi 4    /\ wa 384    /\ w3a 1037   A.wal 1481   E.wex 1704
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-ex 1705
This theorem is referenced by:  alsi-no-surprise  42542
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator