Theorem dfrab3ss 3905

Description: Restricted class abstraction with a common superset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2015.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 8-Nov-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfrab3ss	|- ( A C_ B -> { x e. A | ph } = ( A i^i { x e. B | ph } ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B

Allowed substitution hint:   ph( x)

Proof of Theorem dfrab3ss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ss 3588	. . 3 |- ( A C_ B <-> ( A i^i B ) = A )
2		ineq1 3807	. . . 4 |- ( ( A i^i B ) = A -> ( ( A i^i B ) i^i { x | ph } ) = ( A i^i { x | ph } ) )
3	2	eqcomd 2628	. . 3 |- ( ( A i^i B ) = A -> ( A i^i { x | ph } ) = ( ( A i^i B ) i^i { x | ph } ) )
4	1, 3	sylbi 207	. 2 |- ( A C_ B -> ( A i^i { x | ph } ) = ( ( A i^i B ) i^i { x | ph } ) )
5		dfrab3 3902	. 2 |- { x e. A | ph } = ( A i^i { x | ph } )
6		dfrab3 3902	. . . 4 |- { x e. B | ph } = ( B i^i { x | ph } )
7	6	ineq2i 3811	. . 3 |- ( A i^i { x e. B | ph } ) = ( A i^i ( B i^i { x | ph } ) )
8		inass 3823	. . 3 |- ( ( A i^i B ) i^i { x | ph } ) = ( A i^i ( B i^i { x | ph } ) )
9	7, 8	eqtr4i 2647	. 2 |- ( A i^i { x e. B | ph } ) = ( ( A i^i B ) i^i { x | ph } )
10	4, 5, 9	3eqtr4g 2681	1 |- ( A C_ B -> { x e. A | ph } = ( A i^i { x e. B | ph } ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1483   {cab 2608   {crab 2916   i^i cin 3573   C_ wss 3574

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588

This theorem is referenced by:  mbfposadd  33457  proot1hash  37778