Theorem opabbid 4715

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal ordered-pair class abstractions (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opabbid.1	|- F/ x ph
opabbid.2	|- F/ y ph
opabbid.3	|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opabbid	|- ( ph -> { <. x , y >. | ps } = { <. x , y >. | ch } )

Proof of Theorem opabbid

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opabbid.1	. . . 4 |- F/ x ph
2		opabbid.2	. . . . 5 |- F/ y ph
3		opabbid.3	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
4	3	anbi2d 740	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ( ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) <-> ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) ) )
5	2, 4	exbid 2091	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) <-> E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) ) )
6	1, 5	exbid 2091	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) <-> E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) ) )
7	6	abbidv 2741	. 2 |- ( ph -> { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) } = { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) } )
8		df-opab 4713	. 2 |- { <. x , y >. | ps } = { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) }
9		df-opab 4713	. 2 |- { <. x , y >. | ch } = { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) }
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2681	1 |- ( ph -> { <. x , y >. | ps } = { <. x , y >. | ch } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 196   /\ wa 384   = wceq 1483   E.wex 1704   F/wnf 1708   {cab 2608   <.cop 4183   {copab 4712

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-opab 4713

This theorem is referenced by:  opabbidv  4716  mpteq12f  4731  mpteq12d  4734  mpteq12df  4735  feqmptdf  6251  fnoprabg  6761  sprsymrelfo  41747